Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome

医学 系统回顾 神经丛 生活质量(医疗保健) 儿科 梅德林 外科 政治学 护理部 法学
作者
Flores M. Metz,Juliëtte T.M. Blauw,Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer,Jeroen J. Kolkman,Marco J. Bruno,Robert H. Geelkerken
出处
期刊:European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:64 (6): 720-732 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.033
摘要

Since the first description of the median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), the existence for the syndrome and the efficacy of treatment for it have been questioned.A systematic review conforming to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was conducted, with a broader view on treatment for MALS including any kind of coeliac artery release, coeliac plexus resection, and coeliac plexus blockage, irrespective of age. Online databases were used to identify papers published between 1963 and July 2021. The inclusion criteria were abdominal symptoms, proof of MALS on imaging, and articles reporting at least three patients. Primary outcomes were symptom relief and quality of life (QoL).Thirty-eight studies describing 880 adult patients and six studies describing 195 paediatric patients were included. The majority of the adult studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from three to 228 months after treatment. Two adult studies showed an improved QoL after treatment. Half of the paediatric studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from six to 62 months after laparoscopic coeliac artery release, and four studies reported an improved QoL. Thirty-five (92%) adult studies and five (83%) paediatric studies scored a high or unclear risk of bias for the majority of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) items. The meaning of coeliac plexus resection or blockage could not be substantiated.This systematic review suggests a sustainable symptom relief of more than 70% after treatment for MALS in the majority of adult and paediatric studies; however, owing to the heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and outcome parameters, the risk of bias was high and a formal meta-analysis could not be performed. To improve care for patients with MALS the next steps would be to deal with reporting standards, outcome definitions, and consensus descriptions of the intervention(s), after which an appropriate randomised controlled trial should be performed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xiaodusb完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
天天快乐应助温柔柜子采纳,获得10
2秒前
Criminology34应助oleskarabach采纳,获得10
2秒前
Starwalker应助科研同人采纳,获得30
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
入变发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
ylkylk关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
9秒前
所所应助积极璎采纳,获得10
11秒前
HesperLxy完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
叽里咕噜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Yuan完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
sinlar发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
QUPY发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
善学以致用应助健达采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
HesperLxy发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
海丽完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI6.1应助高天雨采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
NexusExplorer应助粗暴的大门采纳,获得10
16秒前
Akim应助二狗采纳,获得10
16秒前
刘立凡发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
祁梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
方东完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小二郎应助杏杏采纳,获得10
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Third edition 6000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 3000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5785393
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5687580
关于积分的说明 15467396
捐赠科研通 4914484
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2645216
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1593054
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1547382