Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome

医学 系统回顾 神经丛 生活质量(医疗保健) 儿科 梅德林 外科 政治学 护理部 法学
作者
Flores M. Metz,Juliëtte T.M. Blauw,Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer,Jeroen J. Kolkman,Marco J. Bruno,Robert H. Geelkerken
出处
期刊:European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:64 (6): 720-732 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.033
摘要

Since the first description of the median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), the existence for the syndrome and the efficacy of treatment for it have been questioned.A systematic review conforming to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was conducted, with a broader view on treatment for MALS including any kind of coeliac artery release, coeliac plexus resection, and coeliac plexus blockage, irrespective of age. Online databases were used to identify papers published between 1963 and July 2021. The inclusion criteria were abdominal symptoms, proof of MALS on imaging, and articles reporting at least three patients. Primary outcomes were symptom relief and quality of life (QoL).Thirty-eight studies describing 880 adult patients and six studies describing 195 paediatric patients were included. The majority of the adult studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from three to 228 months after treatment. Two adult studies showed an improved QoL after treatment. Half of the paediatric studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from six to 62 months after laparoscopic coeliac artery release, and four studies reported an improved QoL. Thirty-five (92%) adult studies and five (83%) paediatric studies scored a high or unclear risk of bias for the majority of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) items. The meaning of coeliac plexus resection or blockage could not be substantiated.This systematic review suggests a sustainable symptom relief of more than 70% after treatment for MALS in the majority of adult and paediatric studies; however, owing to the heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and outcome parameters, the risk of bias was high and a formal meta-analysis could not be performed. To improve care for patients with MALS the next steps would be to deal with reporting standards, outcome definitions, and consensus descriptions of the intervention(s), after which an appropriate randomised controlled trial should be performed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
喜雨的猫发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
踏实的兔子完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
孟龙威完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
kali发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
传奇3应助NiuNiu采纳,获得50
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
waky发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小陈发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
Sun完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
phil发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助小高采纳,获得10
8秒前
墨薄凉完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
马子妍发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
俊逸香岚完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
小熊维尼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助难过的丹烟采纳,获得10
10秒前
不倒翁发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
猛犸象冲冲冲完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
谢谢发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
彭于晏应助优美紫槐采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
1am33in完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
深情安青应助Sun采纳,获得10
15秒前
小陈完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
王莫为完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
my完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助李d1_采纳,获得10
17秒前
zhugao完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
SciGPT应助雾里青采纳,获得10
18秒前
Orange应助骤雨红尘采纳,获得10
19秒前
tianxiangning完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
El poder y la palabra: prensa y poder político en las dictaduras : el régimen de Franco ante la prensa y el periodismo 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5605669
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4690288
关于积分的说明 14863003
捐赠科研通 4702367
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2542226
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1507853
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1472142