Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome

医学 系统回顾 神经丛 生活质量(医疗保健) 儿科 梅德林 外科 政治学 护理部 法学
作者
Flores M. Metz,Juliëtte T.M. Blauw,Marjolein Brusse‐Keizer,Jeroen J. Kolkman,Marco J. Bruno,Robert H. Geelkerken
出处
期刊:European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:64 (6): 720-732 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.033
摘要

Since the first description of the median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), the existence for the syndrome and the efficacy of treatment for it have been questioned.A systematic review conforming to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was conducted, with a broader view on treatment for MALS including any kind of coeliac artery release, coeliac plexus resection, and coeliac plexus blockage, irrespective of age. Online databases were used to identify papers published between 1963 and July 2021. The inclusion criteria were abdominal symptoms, proof of MALS on imaging, and articles reporting at least three patients. Primary outcomes were symptom relief and quality of life (QoL).Thirty-eight studies describing 880 adult patients and six studies describing 195 paediatric patients were included. The majority of the adult studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from three to 228 months after treatment. Two adult studies showed an improved QoL after treatment. Half of the paediatric studies reported symptom relief of more than 70% from six to 62 months after laparoscopic coeliac artery release, and four studies reported an improved QoL. Thirty-five (92%) adult studies and five (83%) paediatric studies scored a high or unclear risk of bias for the majority of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) items. The meaning of coeliac plexus resection or blockage could not be substantiated.This systematic review suggests a sustainable symptom relief of more than 70% after treatment for MALS in the majority of adult and paediatric studies; however, owing to the heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and outcome parameters, the risk of bias was high and a formal meta-analysis could not be performed. To improve care for patients with MALS the next steps would be to deal with reporting standards, outcome definitions, and consensus descriptions of the intervention(s), after which an appropriate randomised controlled trial should be performed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助笙忘采纳,获得10
1秒前
大模型应助htt采纳,获得10
1秒前
亚特兰蒂斯完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
xiaolu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
juzi完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
情怀应助bonbonly采纳,获得10
5秒前
fedehe发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Seathern完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
英俊的铭应助xh采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
9秒前
fedehe完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
bunny发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
szc-2000完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
有点is完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
禾火完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
一只滦完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Nine完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
pew发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
杨小鸿发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
nancylan发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
青云发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
唐很甜完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
啊呀呀完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
danli完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
在水一方应助汪宇采纳,获得10
24秒前
Pan发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
苗条平萱完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
AJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
32秒前
摸鱼仙人完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Human Embryology and Developmental Biology 7th Edition 2000
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology 12th Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5742180
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5406715
关于积分的说明 15344214
捐赠科研通 4883585
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625155
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1574005
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1530964