Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome

医学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 外科 临床试验 切除术 内科学
作者
Sameh Hany Emile,Zoe Garoufalia,Samer Hani Barsom,Nir Horesh,Rachel Gefen,Peige Zhou,Steven D. Wexner
出处
期刊:Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:173 (6): 1352-1358 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.010
摘要

Abstract

Background

We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials on treating low anterior resection syndrome to help inform current practice.

Methods

This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses–compliant systematic review of randomized clinical trials involved different treatments for low anterior resection syndrome. The risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The main outcomes were improvement in low anterior resection syndrome after treatment assessed by change in low anterior resection syndrome, fecal incontinence scores, and adverse treatment effects.

Results

After an initial screening of 1,286 studies, 7 randomized clinical trials were included. Sample sizes ranged between 12 to 104 patients. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation was the most frequently assessed treatment in 3 randomized clinical trials. The weighted mean difference between posterior tibial nerve stimulation and medical treatment or sham therapy in follow-up low anterior resection syndrome score (–3.31, P = .157) was insignificant. Transanal irrigation reduced major low anterior resection syndrome symptoms by 61.5% compared with 28.6% after posterior tibial nerve stimulation with a significantly lower 6-month follow-up low anterior resection syndrome score. Pelvic floor training achieved better improvement in low anterior resection syndrome than standard care (47.8% vs 21.3%) at 6 months, but this was not maintained at 12 months (40.0% vs 34.9%). Ramosetron was associated with a greater short-term improvement in major low anterior resection syndrome (23% vs 8%) and a lower low anterior resection syndrome score (29.5 vs 34.6) at 4-weeks follow-up than Kegels or Sitz baths. No significant improvement in bowel function was noted after probiotics use as probiotics and placebo had similar follow-up low anterior resection syndrome scores (33.3 vs 36).

Conclusion

Transanal irrigation was associated with improvement in low anterior resection syndrome according to 2 trials, and ramosetron showed promising short-term results in one trial. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation had a marginal benefit compared with standard care. In contrast, pelvic floor training was associated with short-term symptomatic improvement, and probiotics showed no tangible improvement in low anterior resection syndrome symptoms. Firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to the small number of trials published.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
May完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
全齐发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
罗备完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
博弈春秋应助linguobin采纳,获得10
4秒前
知性的颜完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
slb1319完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
花卷儿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
研友_ZzMqOn发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
个性的向秋完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
情怀应助zhaoyuli采纳,获得10
10秒前
暗号1823发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
全齐完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
探寻发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Gtingting发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小马甲应助uu采纳,获得10
14秒前
16秒前
lkmg完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
0816my应助花卷儿采纳,获得10
20秒前
经费又被砍了完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
CEJ完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
无情亦凝发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
拉长的初彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
宋宋发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
兴奋的定帮应助zgh采纳,获得10
24秒前
稗子发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
lixiangrui110发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
糖璃关注了科研通微信公众号
25秒前
xxiao完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975814
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520123
关于积分的说明 11201020
捐赠科研通 3256502
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798347
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877523
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806417