Prophylactic efficacy of lithium, valproic acid, and carbamazepine in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder

卡马西平 丙戊酸 双相情感障碍 危险系数 情绪稳定器 锂(药物) 心情 置信区间 内科学 比例危险模型 医学 情感障碍症 心理学 精神科 狂躁 癫痫
作者
Eric D. Peselow,Steven Clevenger,Waguih William IsHak
出处
期刊:International Clinical Psychopharmacology [Wolters Kluwer]
卷期号:31 (4): 218-223 被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1097/yic.0000000000000097
摘要

Mood stabilizers are used clinically for the management of bipolar disorder. Prophylactic therapy with mood stabilizers is the primary treatment for preventing depressive and manic relapses in bipolar patients once they are stabilized. In this study, we examined the relative efficacy of the three most commonly used mood-stabilizing agents: lithium (Li), valproic acid (VPA), and carbamazepine (CBZ), in preventing relapse episodes. A total of 225 patients with bipolar disorder were included in the present analysis. Patients taking Li, VPA, or CBZ were followed up for up to 124 months, until suffering a manic, mixed, or depressive episode (relapse), or until the end of the study/study termination (no relapse), whichever came first. The median unadjusted survival time was 36 months for patients taking VPA, 42 months for patients taking CBZ, and 81 months for patients taking Li. These results indicate that patients stayed longer on Li, suggesting that it might have been better tolerated than either CBZ or VPA. χ-Analysis showed that patients taking Li were significantly less likely to experience relapse during the observational period than patients taking either VPA or CBZ (P<0.05). A Cox regression model showed that the hazard of experiencing relapse was significantly predicted by the total number of depressive (P=0.007) and manic symptoms (P=0.02) assessed before the observation period. In addition, after controlling for symptom covariates, the hazard of experiencing relapse was 1.66 times (95% confidence interval 1.03-2.67) or 66% higher for patients taking VPA compared with patients taking Li (P=0.037). Although the hazard of experiencing relapse was higher for patients taking CBZ compared with those taking Li, the risk was not elevated by a significant amount. Notwithstanding the limitations of the naturalistic design of this study, the differences in relapse prevention and survival time observed in these medications show Li fairing relatively better in prophylactic therapy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
QOP应助wuwei采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
小冉发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
欢城发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
我是老大应助王wangWANG采纳,获得10
4秒前
helicase发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
思源应助88C真是太神奇啦采纳,获得10
5秒前
华仔应助88C真是太神奇啦采纳,获得10
5秒前
情怀应助88C真是太神奇啦采纳,获得10
5秒前
方法完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
always完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
天天快乐应助GalaxyKe采纳,获得10
6秒前
12a完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
阿斯蒂和琴酒完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Komorebi完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
欢城完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
无心的樱发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
易璇璇发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
YY完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
紫色系发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
bkagyin应助曹志凡采纳,获得10
16秒前
彭于晏应助追寻的蓝采纳,获得10
18秒前
Lancer发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
易璇璇完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
小冉完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
Jasper应助qiushui采纳,获得10
23秒前
远山完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
三土有兀完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
酷酷萃发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
李健应助喔喔采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3670705
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3227648
关于积分的说明 9776557
捐赠科研通 2937823
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609637
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760441
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735874