Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

卡波扎尼布 舒尼替尼 无容量 肾细胞癌 医学 肾癌 肿瘤科 成本效益分析 成本效益 内科学 癌症 免疫疗法 风险分析(工程)
作者
Ruizhe Liu,Kaifeng Qiu,Junyan Wu,Yanqing Jiang,Peihao Wu,Jianxin Pang
出处
期刊:Immunotherapy [Future Medicine]
卷期号:14 (11): 859-869 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.2217/imt-2021-0156
摘要

Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma with nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib from a US payer perspective. Methods: Economic outcomes were estimated with Markov and partitioned survival models. Efficacy, safety and other data were taken from the CheckMate 9ER trial. Costs and utilities were gathered from published sources. Sensitivity analyses addressed model uncertainties. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib was US$555,663 and $531,748 per quality-adjusted life year in the Markov and partitioned survival models, respectively, exceeding the willingness-to-pay threshold (US$150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year). Sensitivity analyses showed robust outcomes. Conclusion: From a US payer perspective, first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma is not cost effective.Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common cancer in the USA. Up to 30% of patients with RCC are in an advanced stage of disease at diagnosis. RCC is difficult to cure, with an 11% chance of survival after 5 years for patients with advanced RCC. A recent clinical study showed that nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NC) had a greater benefit in patients with advanced RCC than sunitinib. The US FDA approved NC for advanced RCC, but NC is relatively expensive. This study explored the cost–effectiveness of NC for advanced RCC versus sunitinib for a US payer using two cost–effectiveness models developed based on the results of the aforementioned clinical study. The results showed that to gain an additional year in perfect health, NC costs an average of US$555,663 or $531,748 more versus sunitinib, which is more than a US payer is willing to pay for an additional year in perfect health ($150,000). Therefore, NC for advanced RCC is not cost-effective versus sunitinib for a US payer at current prices.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
夏青荷发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
初夏发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
vvA11完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI5应助研友_nxeAlZ采纳,获得10
2秒前
pluto应助小王同志采纳,获得20
2秒前
2秒前
平常的凡之完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
酷波er应助科研小笨猪采纳,获得10
5秒前
fish完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
欧小仙完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
yungu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
orixero应助danlionchy采纳,获得10
7秒前
ZXD1989完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
栗子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
张钦奎完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
moon完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
fjh应助橘子采纳,获得30
10秒前
zt永不重名完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
和尘同光发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小小文完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
tyran发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
自觉平露发布了新的文献求助500
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
Akim应助普罗帕酮采纳,获得30
14秒前
15秒前
moon发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
口腔飞飞完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
lyx完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
hbiuhio完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Zero完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
大马猴发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
夏青荷发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
a雪橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
Resilience of a Nation: A History of the Military in Rwanda 888
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3736925
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3280839
关于积分的说明 10021396
捐赠科研通 2997494
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1644637
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 782085
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749707