复制
生物
体细胞
循环肿瘤DNA
预测值
遗传学
基因
计算生物学
内科学
癌症
医学
数学
统计
作者
Daniel Stetson,Ambar Ahmed,Xing Xu,Barrett Nuttall,Tristan Lubinski,Justin Johnson,J. Carl Barrett,Brian Dougherty
出处
期刊:JCO precision oncology
[American Society of Clinical Oncology]
日期:2019-03-14
卷期号: (3): 1-9
被引量:144
摘要
Discordance between plasma and tumor variant calling has been attributed primarily to tumor heterogeneity, whereas technical variables remain largely unexplored.To measure these variables, we tested four next-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panel assays for mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using replicate sets of 24 plasma samples and compared the results with matched tumor-normal tissue pairs.Our orthogonal approach identified false-negative (FN) and false-positive (FP) variants with high confidence and revealed substantial variability among the ctDNA assays, with a range of sensitivity (38% to 89%) and positive predictive value (36% to 80%). Most discordance in our cross-vendor study was observed below 1% variant allele frequency. FP variants displayed mutational biases and tended to be novel variants not found in somatic databases. Of the 56 unique variants called by all four ctDNA assays, 41 (68%) resulted from technical discordance.These findings suggest that most NGS assay discordance is a result of technical variations and, to a lesser extent, biologic factors such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and tumor heterogeneity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI