Effect of Insurance Status on Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty

Shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic shoulder arthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy. Although there have been reports of variations in complication rates according to insurance type, few studies have examined the effect of payer status on functional outcomes. Patients who underwent elective shoulder arthroplasty performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were queried. Patient characteristics were compared across insurance types. Each patient completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. A generalized linear mixed model was specified to predict ASES score at 1 year and included preoperative ASES score as an adjustment variable. A total of 84 patients underwent 91 procedures. Before surgery, ASES score differed by insurance type ( P =.014), with lower scores in the Medicaid cohort compared with the private insurance cohort (20.4 vs 38.8, P =.009). After controlling for baseline ASES score, postoperative ASES score at 1-year follow-up differed by insurance type ( P <.001). Patients with private insurance had better ASES scores (85.6) than patients with Medicaid (55.2) ( P <.001) and workers' compensation (57.1) ( P =.028). Patients with Medicare (80.6) had better ASES scores at follow-up compared with those with Medicaid ( P <.001). Patients with Medicaid are at risk for significantly lower postoperative functional outcome scores after shoulder arthroplasty compared with patients with private insurance and Medicare. In this study, patients with Medicaid had lower preoperative ASES scores compared with other groups. These observed differences are likely multifactorial and should be acknowledged when counseling patients. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(6):e523–e528.]