贝伐单抗
医学
奥沙利铂
福克斯
叶酸
内科学
结直肠癌
肿瘤科
卡培他滨
临床终点
安慰剂
化疗
危险系数
无进展生存期
外科
随机对照试验
癌症
置信区间
病理
替代医学
作者
Leonard B. Saltz,Stephen Clarke,Eduardo Díaz‐Rubio,Werner Scheithauer,Arié Figer,Ralph Wong,Sheryl Koski,Mikhail Lichinitser,Tsai‐Shen Yang,Fernando Rivera,Félix Couture,Florin Sirzén,Jim Cassidy
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2007.14.9930
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and Methods Patients with MCRC were randomly assigned, in a 2 × 2 factorial design, to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to bevacizumab versus placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 1,401 patients were randomly assigned in this 2 × 2 analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab group and 8.0 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .0023). Median overall survival was 21.3 months in the bevacizumab group and 19.9 months in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P = .077). Response rates were similar in both arms. Analysis of treatment withdrawals showed that, despite protocol allowance of treatment continuation until disease progression, only 29% and 47% of bevacizumab and placebo recipients, respectively, were treated until progression. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC. Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was not improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Treatment continuation until disease progression may be necessary in order to optimize the contribution of bevacizumab to therapy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI