医学
斜面
活检
交叉研究
随机对照试验
核医学
前瞻性队列研究
放射科
细针活检
肝活检
外科
作者
Pradermchai Kongkam,Nutbordee Nalinthassanai,Piyapan Prueksapanich,Anapat Sanpavat,Arlyn R. Cañones,Thanawat Luangsukrerk,Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon,Wiriyaporn Ridtitid,Pinit Kullavanijaya,Sombat Treeprasertsuk,Rungsun Rerknimitr
出处
期刊:Hpb
[Elsevier]
日期:2021-10-29
卷期号:24 (6): 797-805
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.009
摘要
Data on the use of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) of solid liver mass (SLM) for pathology is limited.To prove superiority of the diagnostic rate of the newly designed modified Menghini-type needle with a beveled side-slot near the needle tip with slot cutting edge directed 20-gauge antegrade bevel (group A) over the original 22-gauge reverse bevel (group B) for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) of solid liver mass (SLM) in a prospective crossover randomized controlled trial.The overall diagnostic accuracy rate of the 52 passes was 86.5% (45/52) and of group A versus B were 88.5% (23/26) versus 84.6% (22/26), respectively, p = 0.858. Tissue adequacy levels of both groups were not significantly different (grade A: B: C = 18:6:2 versus 16:7:3), p = 0.839). Grading of blood contamination of both groups was not significantly different. However, it was found that the group-A needles could biopsy tissue of significantly longer length than that of the group B; 1.3 cm (SD = 0.76) versus 0.8 cm (SD = 0.54); p = 0.007.The use of EUS-FNB of SLM is highly effective with similar levels of efficacy and number of adverse events between both types of needles.Thai Clinical Trial Registration No. TCTR2018081002.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI