气门正时
涡轮增压器
平均有效压力
废气再循环
汽车工程
柴油
柴油机
热效率
燃料效率
环境科学
燃烧
圆柱
内燃机
工程类
化学
压缩比
机械工程
气体压缩机
有机化学
作者
Erick Garcia,Vassilis Triantopoulos,Joseph Trzaska,Maxwell Taylor,Jian Li,André L. Boehman
标识
DOI:10.1177/14680874211059309
摘要
This study experimentally investigates the impact of extreme Miller cycle strategies paired with high intake manifold pressures on the combustion process, emissions, and thermal efficiency of heavy-duty diesel engines. Well-controlled experiments isolating the effect of Miller cycle strategies on the combustion process were conducted at constant engine speed and load (1160 rpm, 1.76 MPa net IMEP) on a single cylinder research engine equipped with a fully-flexible hydraulic valve train system. Late intake valve closing (LIVC) timing strategies were compared to a conventional intake valve profile under either constant cylinder composition, constant engine-out NO x emission, or constant overall turbocharger efficiency ([Formula: see text]) to investigate the operating constraints that favor Miller cycle operation over the baseline strategy. Utilizing high boost with conventional intake valve closing timing resulted in improved fuel consumption at the expense of sharp increases in peak cylinder pressures, engine-out NO x emissions, and reduced exhaust temperatures. Miller cycle without EGR at constant [Formula: see text] demonstrated LIVC strategies effectively reduce engine-out NO x emissions by up to 35%. However, Miller cycle associated with very aggressive LIVC timings led to fuel consumption penalties due to increased pumping work and exhaust enthalpy. LIVC strategies allowed for increased charge dilution at the baseline NO x constraint of 3.2 g/kWh, resulting in significant fuel consumption benefits over the baseline case without compromising exhaust temperatures or peak cylinder pressures. As Miller cycle implementation was shown to affect the boundary conditions dictating [Formula: see text], the LIVC and conventional IVC cases were studied at an equivalent [Formula: see text] point representative of high boost operation. With high boost, LIVC yielded reduced NO x emissions, reduced peak cylinder pressures, and elevated exhaust temperatures compared to the conventional IVC case without compromising fuel consumption.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI