对话
心理干预
斜切
义务
护理部
会话分析
医疗保健
经验知识
初级保健
智力残疾
心理学
医学
家庭医学
沟通
精神科
经济
经济增长
工作(物理)
机械工程
哲学
认识论
政治学
法学
工程类
标识
DOI:10.1177/10497323221089875
摘要
People with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience marked health inequalities. This is attributable, at least in part, to suboptimal healthcare communication with health care practitioners (HCPs) whereby patients with ID and HCPs struggle to understand each other. Companions who attend healthcare appointments with patients with ID can support the communicative exchange between patient and HCP, but their involvement can have unintended consequences. This article uses Conversation Analysis (CA) to analyse video-recorded data from primary care health checks involving 24 patients with ID. This method shows that companions use their linguistic and experiential resources to intervene as ‘brokers’ to address real or potential threats to mutual understanding between patients with ID and HCPs. Their interventions can fill in the gaps in knowledge and understanding of the other parties, but also run the risk of deskilling the others in the interaction, by relieving them of the obligation to address communication breakdown directly themselves.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI