医学
再现性
组内相关
核医学
变异系数
心脏病学
重复性
生物医学工程
作者
Jelmer Westra,Martin Sejr-Hansen,Łukasz Kołtowski,Hernán Mejía-Rentería,Shengxian Tu,Janusz Kochman,Yimin Zhang,Tommy Liu,Gianluca Campo,Jakob Hjort,Lone Juul Hune Mogensen,Andrea Erriquez,Birgitte Krogsgaard Andersen,Ashkan Eftekhari,Javier Escaned,Evald Høj Christiansen,Niels Ramsing Holm
出处
期刊:Eurointervention
[Europa Digital and Publishing]
日期:2021-07-06
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.4244/eij-d-21-00425
摘要
Background Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a tool for physiological lesion assessment based on invasive coronary angiography. Aims We aimed to assess the reproducibility of QFR computed from the same angiograms as assessed by multiple observers from different, international sites. Methods We included 50 patients previously enrolled in dedicated QFR studies. QFR was computed twice, one month apart by five blinded observers. The main analysis was the coefficient of variation (CV) as a measure of intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Key secondary analysis was identification of clinical and procedural characteristics predicting reproducibility. Results The intraobserver CV ranged from 2.3% (1.5-2.8) to 10.2% (6.6-12.0) among the observers. The interobserver CV was 9.4% (8.0-10.5). The QFR observer, low angiographic quality, and low FFR were independent predictors of a large absolute difference between repeated QFR measurements defined as a difference larger than the median difference (>0.03). Conclusions The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for QFR computed from the same angiograms ranged from high to poor among multiple observers from different sites with an average agreement of 0.01±0.08 for repeated measurements. The reproducibility was dependent on the observer, angiographic quality and the coronary artery stenosis severity as assessed with FFR.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI