Frailty Index Is Associated With Periprosthetic Fracture and Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty

医学 假体周围 危险系数 优势比 关节置换术 外科 比例危险模型 骨科手术 置信区间 内科学
作者
Rebecca L. Johnson,Matthew P. Abdel,Ryan D. Frank,Alanna M. Chamberlain,Elizabeth B. Habermann,Carlos B. Mantilla
出处
期刊:Orthopedics [SLACK, Inc.]
卷期号:42 (6): 335-343 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.3928/01477447-20190812-05
摘要

This cohort study of adult (≥50 years) patients aimed to calculate a validated, preoperative frailty deficit index (FI) and used it to compare outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), primary and revision, from 2005 through 2016. Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, the authors analyzed whether FI, adjusted for age, predicts outcomes prior to hospital discharge, within 90 days, and within 365 days. They classified 9818 patients undergoing TKA (7920 primary and 1898 revision; median age, 69 years) as frail (21%), vulnerable (39%), and non-frail (40%). Frail, relative to non-frail, patients were more often female with more systemic diseases (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ≥III). While in-hospital, frail patients were found to have increased odds of reoperation (odds ratio, 2.52) and wound complications/hematoma (odds ratio, 2.15). Within 90 days, there was increased risk for periprosthetic fracture (>4-fold) and mortality (>9-fold) following TKA after age adjustment. Within the first year, frail patients were at heightened risk for death (hazard ratio, 8.08), any patient infection (hazard ratio, 1.97), wound complications/hematoma (hazard ratio, 2.16), periprosthetic fracture (hazard ratio, 3.03), and reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.41). At no time point were significant associations found with arthrofibrosis, aseptic loosening, or patellar clunk syndrome. One-fifth of patients undergoing primary and revision TKAs are frail and at notable risk for complications. Calculating a preoperative FI should guide pre-habilitation efforts (eg, chronic disease management, wellness) before and postoperative surveillance after TKA. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(6):335–343.]
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
善学以致用应助zebra8848采纳,获得10
1秒前
小二郎应助甜滋滋采纳,获得10
2秒前
liusaki完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
星辰发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
星辰大海应助zhangsudi采纳,获得30
3秒前
4秒前
领导范儿应助莹莹采纳,获得10
4秒前
危机的蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
念工人发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
地塞米松应助风起青禾采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
斯文败类应助精明孤云采纳,获得10
10秒前
14秒前
zebra8848发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
念工人完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
熊大发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
嗯哼应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
18秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
Dore应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
华仔应助nano采纳,获得10
20秒前
甜滋滋发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
zhangsudi发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
科研通AI2S应助念工人采纳,获得10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
111完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
tianzml0应助ccalvintan采纳,获得10
29秒前
Owen应助熊大采纳,获得10
30秒前
鬼鬼发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
格子完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Khalil完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
rhetoric, logic and argumentation: a guide to student writers 1000
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
A Chronicle of Small Beer: The Memoirs of Nan Green 1000
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History 900
Eric Dunning and the Sociology of Sport 850
The Cambridge Introduction to Intercultural Communication 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2918843
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2559698
关于积分的说明 6925506
捐赠科研通 2219109
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1179632
版权声明 588587
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 577260