Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

地尔硫卓 医学 氨氯地平 维拉帕米 硝苯地平 非洛地平 药理学 尼索地平 钙通道阻滞剂 尼卡地平 麻醉 内科学 血压
作者
Anselm Wong,Robert S. Hoffman,Steven J. Walsh,Darren M. Roberts,Sophie Gosselin,Timothy E. Bunchman,Sofia Kebede,Valéry Lavergne,Marc Ghannoum
出处
期刊:Clinical Toxicology [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:59 (5): 361-375 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1080/15563650.2020.1870123
摘要

Background Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.Methods We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.Results A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.Conclusions Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LiFeiYu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
欢歌笑语发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
nino发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
3秒前
小灰灰完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
yz完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
哈哈悦完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
帝国超级硕士完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
亲亲发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
夏大海完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Oliver完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
wm完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研小蔡发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
二三发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
yingccc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
欢歌笑语完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Zephr发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Nariy完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
兴奋不弱发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
风和日丽完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
英俊的铭应助yanzu采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI2S应助cyx采纳,获得10
14秒前
无聊的凡阳完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
杰杰完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
科研通AI5应助一二采纳,获得30
18秒前
亲亲完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
yolo发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
noflatterer完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Chikit完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
xian林发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
兴奋不弱完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
海孩子完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Animal Physiology 2000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3736892
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3280817
关于积分的说明 10021089
捐赠科研通 2997457
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1644633
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 782083
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749703