Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1

虚假关系 连续变量 变量 变量(数学) 校长(计算机安全) 主题(文档) 心理学 计算机科学 计量经济学 统计 数学 图书馆学 数学分析 操作系统
作者
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
出处
期刊:Journal of Consumer Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:35 (1): 5-8 被引量:436
标识
DOI:10.1086/589561
摘要

Why call for a death to dichotomizing? The Journal of Consumer Research receives manuscripts on an almost daily basis in which researchers have dichotomized (often referred to as median splitting) a continuous independent variable. There are two principal problems with this approach to data analysis, each of which is very well documented in the literature. The first is that by dichotomizing continuous independent variables researchers are quite likely reducing the statistical power available to test their hypotheses (Irwin and McClelland 2003). The second, potentially more troubling, problem is that inappropriate dichotomizing of continuous data can at times create spurious significant results if the independent variables are correlated (Maxwell and Delaney 1993). And yet, despite these well-known problems, dichotomizing is an extremely frequent activity for experimental consumer researchers. The goal of this editorial is not to write an in-depth methodological piece on this subject but rather to briefly outline why all consumer researchers should be concerned about this topic. I also hope to illustrate how we can easily write up appropriately conducted analyses when our research designs include continuous independent variables. (For more thorough, methodological pieces on this topic I suggest an excellent and concise article in the Journal of Marketing Research [Irwin and McClelland 2001] or a truly comprehensive guide to performing analysis including continuous independent variables and interactions [Aiken and West 1991].) Likely the most common research design utilized by experimental consumer researchers is a very straightforward manipulation of one or more independent variables that the researcher believes will affect a dependent variable. Virtually all consumer researchers learn at one point how to describe and analyze such designs and are typically quite adept at it. For example, a researcher manipulates two independent variables between subjects and performs a two-by-two ANOVA examining their impact on a dependent variable …
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
今后的应助被程风破浪采纳,获得10
刚刚
li发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
蜂蜂完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
whj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
饥渴小白发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
思源的应助被铁甲小子采纳,获得30
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
6秒前
lgy发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
天空发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
zzn完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
年轻小鸭子完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
ss完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
任性雪糕完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高女士发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
4747发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
轻松香菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
FashionBoy的应助被阿三采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
达子唉科研完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
饥渴小白完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
gwyn关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
无极微光的应助被lgy采纳,获得20
17秒前
悦耳绮玉完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被master采纳,获得10
19秒前
早睡晚起每天摸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
纪乐姗发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高女士完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
Lucas的应助被Xufan采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
SciGPT的应助被薄荷Wake采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
李兰陵发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
彭于晏的应助被aike采纳,获得10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
CODESSA 2000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
Organizational Behavior 510
The Welfare Assembly Line: Public Servants in the Suffering City 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7851354
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9371032
关于积分的说明 20675620
捐赠科研通 7448767
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3344005
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2486680
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2366899