Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1

虚假关系 连续变量 变量 变量(数学) 校长(计算机安全) 主题(文档) 心理学 计算机科学 计量经济学 统计 数学 图书馆学 数学分析 操作系统
作者
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
出处
期刊:Journal of Consumer Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:35 (1): 5-8 被引量:436
标识
DOI:10.1086/589561
摘要

Why call for a death to dichotomizing? The Journal of Consumer Research receives manuscripts on an almost daily basis in which researchers have dichotomized (often referred to as median splitting) a continuous independent variable. There are two principal problems with this approach to data analysis, each of which is very well documented in the literature. The first is that by dichotomizing continuous independent variables researchers are quite likely reducing the statistical power available to test their hypotheses (Irwin and McClelland 2003). The second, potentially more troubling, problem is that inappropriate dichotomizing of continuous data can at times create spurious significant results if the independent variables are correlated (Maxwell and Delaney 1993). And yet, despite these well-known problems, dichotomizing is an extremely frequent activity for experimental consumer researchers. The goal of this editorial is not to write an in-depth methodological piece on this subject but rather to briefly outline why all consumer researchers should be concerned about this topic. I also hope to illustrate how we can easily write up appropriately conducted analyses when our research designs include continuous independent variables. (For more thorough, methodological pieces on this topic I suggest an excellent and concise article in the Journal of Marketing Research [Irwin and McClelland 2001] or a truly comprehensive guide to performing analysis including continuous independent variables and interactions [Aiken and West 1991].) Likely the most common research design utilized by experimental consumer researchers is a very straightforward manipulation of one or more independent variables that the researcher believes will affect a dependent variable. Virtually all consumer researchers learn at one point how to describe and analyze such designs and are typically quite adept at it. For example, a researcher manipulates two independent variables between subjects and performs a two-by-two ANOVA examining their impact on a dependent variable …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
乐乐应助杨小鸿采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
紧张的谷槐完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
幽逸完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Szw666完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
jojo完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
lll完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
VAN发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
徐小美完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
传奇3应助lll采纳,获得30
15秒前
老仙翁完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
lilyz615完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
ding应助听见采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
斯文败类应助kuny采纳,获得10
21秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
aniver完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
痕丶歆完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
JY完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
酷波er应助77采纳,获得10
26秒前
开朗啤酒完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
独特的缘分完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
震动的听安完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
调皮语雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
大力向南完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
所所应助xbw采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
33秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
36秒前
Ooo完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Human Embryology and Developmental Biology 7th Edition 2000
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology 12th Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5742197
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5407018
关于积分的说明 15344388
捐赠科研通 4883635
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625185
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1574043
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1530978