Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1

虚假关系 连续变量 变量 变量(数学) 校长(计算机安全) 主题(文档) 心理学 计算机科学 计量经济学 统计 数学 图书馆学 数学分析 操作系统
作者
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
出处
期刊:Journal of Consumer Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:35 (1): 5-8 被引量:436
标识
DOI:10.1086/589561
摘要

Why call for a death to dichotomizing? The Journal of Consumer Research receives manuscripts on an almost daily basis in which researchers have dichotomized (often referred to as median splitting) a continuous independent variable. There are two principal problems with this approach to data analysis, each of which is very well documented in the literature. The first is that by dichotomizing continuous independent variables researchers are quite likely reducing the statistical power available to test their hypotheses (Irwin and McClelland 2003). The second, potentially more troubling, problem is that inappropriate dichotomizing of continuous data can at times create spurious significant results if the independent variables are correlated (Maxwell and Delaney 1993). And yet, despite these well-known problems, dichotomizing is an extremely frequent activity for experimental consumer researchers. The goal of this editorial is not to write an in-depth methodological piece on this subject but rather to briefly outline why all consumer researchers should be concerned about this topic. I also hope to illustrate how we can easily write up appropriately conducted analyses when our research designs include continuous independent variables. (For more thorough, methodological pieces on this topic I suggest an excellent and concise article in the Journal of Marketing Research [Irwin and McClelland 2001] or a truly comprehensive guide to performing analysis including continuous independent variables and interactions [Aiken and West 1991].) Likely the most common research design utilized by experimental consumer researchers is a very straightforward manipulation of one or more independent variables that the researcher believes will affect a dependent variable. Virtually all consumer researchers learn at one point how to describe and analyze such designs and are typically quite adept at it. For example, a researcher manipulates two independent variables between subjects and performs a two-by-two ANOVA examining their impact on a dependent variable …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英姑应助李富贵采纳,获得10
刚刚
传奇3应助1096采纳,获得20
1秒前
ydfqlzj完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
顾矜应助Mr鹿采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
楚科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
SYSUer发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
玛瑙完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
舒适的半芹完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
灵犀发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
852应助11采纳,获得10
4秒前
mobei完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
六六发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
小潘同学发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
万能的小叮当完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
Lucky完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
worldcup完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
苏日古嘎完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
平淡纸飞机完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
ysm发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
烟花应助LSQ47采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助河豚宋采纳,获得10
8秒前
汉堡包应助李庆林采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
晕晕晕完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zhaohu47完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
笨笨烨华完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
hismeng完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Betty发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
张112233完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
2026 Hospital Accreditation Standards 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6263832
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8085582
关于积分的说明 16896704
捐赠科研通 5334297
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2839220
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1816720
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1670401