Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1

虚假关系 连续变量 变量 变量(数学) 校长(计算机安全) 主题(文档) 心理学 计算机科学 计量经济学 统计 数学 图书馆学 操作系统 数学分析
作者
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
出处
期刊:Journal of Consumer Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:35 (1): 5-8 被引量:436
标识
DOI:10.1086/589561
摘要

Why call for a death to dichotomizing? The Journal of Consumer Research receives manuscripts on an almost daily basis in which researchers have dichotomized (often referred to as median splitting) a continuous independent variable. There are two principal problems with this approach to data analysis, each of which is very well documented in the literature. The first is that by dichotomizing continuous independent variables researchers are quite likely reducing the statistical power available to test their hypotheses (Irwin and McClelland 2003). The second, potentially more troubling, problem is that inappropriate dichotomizing of continuous data can at times create spurious significant results if the independent variables are correlated (Maxwell and Delaney 1993). And yet, despite these well-known problems, dichotomizing is an extremely frequent activity for experimental consumer researchers. The goal of this editorial is not to write an in-depth methodological piece on this subject but rather to briefly outline why all consumer researchers should be concerned about this topic. I also hope to illustrate how we can easily write up appropriately conducted analyses when our research designs include continuous independent variables. (For more thorough, methodological pieces on this topic I suggest an excellent and concise article in the Journal of Marketing Research [Irwin and McClelland 2001] or a truly comprehensive guide to performing analysis including continuous independent variables and interactions [Aiken and West 1991].) Likely the most common research design utilized by experimental consumer researchers is a very straightforward manipulation of one or more independent variables that the researcher believes will affect a dependent variable. Virtually all consumer researchers learn at one point how to describe and analyze such designs and are typically quite adept at it. For example, a researcher manipulates two independent variables between subjects and performs a two-by-two ANOVA examining their impact on a dependent variable …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欢呼宛秋完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
小蘑菇应助abc采纳,获得10
1秒前
波波发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Owen应助zihao采纳,获得10
2秒前
MJC发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.2应助全没了采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
mini发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
6秒前
gyn发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
7秒前
畅快的觅山完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cyx完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
科目三应助Evelyn采纳,获得10
8秒前
orixero应助MJC采纳,获得10
8秒前
王翰林完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
benchow发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
Akim应助LULU采纳,获得10
9秒前
隐形曼青应助Brand_xu采纳,获得10
10秒前
kk完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
超超完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
追梦小帅发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
cyx发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
分析化学发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
聪慧灵松完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小星星bulingbuling完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
传奇3应助hui采纳,获得10
14秒前
Jimmy_King完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
合适磬完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
呵呵应助STP顶峰相见采纳,获得10
16秒前
微笑的剑鬼完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zhang7jing发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
咳嗽・喀痰の診療ガイドライン第2版2025 800
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
The globalisation of real estate: the politics and practice of foreign real estate investment 500
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7014000
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8687226
关于积分的说明 18415973
捐赠科研通 6501528
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3106319
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2176446
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2082200