Death to Dichotomizing: Figure 1

虚假关系 连续变量 变量 变量(数学) 校长(计算机安全) 主题(文档) 心理学 计算机科学 计量经济学 统计 数学 图书馆学 数学分析 操作系统
作者
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
出处
期刊:Journal of Consumer Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:35 (1): 5-8 被引量:436
标识
DOI:10.1086/589561
摘要

Why call for a death to dichotomizing? The Journal of Consumer Research receives manuscripts on an almost daily basis in which researchers have dichotomized (often referred to as median splitting) a continuous independent variable. There are two principal problems with this approach to data analysis, each of which is very well documented in the literature. The first is that by dichotomizing continuous independent variables researchers are quite likely reducing the statistical power available to test their hypotheses (Irwin and McClelland 2003). The second, potentially more troubling, problem is that inappropriate dichotomizing of continuous data can at times create spurious significant results if the independent variables are correlated (Maxwell and Delaney 1993). And yet, despite these well-known problems, dichotomizing is an extremely frequent activity for experimental consumer researchers. The goal of this editorial is not to write an in-depth methodological piece on this subject but rather to briefly outline why all consumer researchers should be concerned about this topic. I also hope to illustrate how we can easily write up appropriately conducted analyses when our research designs include continuous independent variables. (For more thorough, methodological pieces on this topic I suggest an excellent and concise article in the Journal of Marketing Research [Irwin and McClelland 2001] or a truly comprehensive guide to performing analysis including continuous independent variables and interactions [Aiken and West 1991].) Likely the most common research design utilized by experimental consumer researchers is a very straightforward manipulation of one or more independent variables that the researcher believes will affect a dependent variable. Virtually all consumer researchers learn at one point how to describe and analyze such designs and are typically quite adept at it. For example, a researcher manipulates two independent variables between subjects and performs a two-by-two ANOVA examining their impact on a dependent variable …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
阿愿完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
yxdjzwx发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
大个应助柚屿采纳,获得10
1秒前
mushiyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
端庄一刀完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
秋秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Rainsoul完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
坤坤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
茉莉Molly发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
脑洞疼应助Jiawei采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
Hello应助波西米亚之心采纳,获得10
4秒前
豆子完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Freedom发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
wanci应助顺心傲南采纳,获得10
5秒前
CJ发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
不安的半梦完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Fi9zero完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
七七发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
在水一方应助小康找文献采纳,获得10
8秒前
无花果应助大方的涫采纳,获得10
8秒前
zhl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
清秀元柏关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
miracle完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
桂绳发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
斯文败类应助Moter采纳,获得10
12秒前
李爱国应助hhh采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
含糊的问薇完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
芒硝灰发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
科研通AI6.2应助深雨采纳,获得10
17秒前
elysia完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小康找文献完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
wanci应助直率的元菱采纳,获得10
18秒前
北鱼发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小小k完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6718603
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8455798
关于积分的说明 18052424
捐赠科研通 5969180
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2995323
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1971407
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1924188