Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 致盲 随机对照试验 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护医学 急诊医学 儿科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Fabienne Gebistorf,Oliver Karam,Jørn Wetterslev,Arash Afshari
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2018 (12) 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002787.pub3
摘要

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Alice0210完成签到 ,获得积分20
1秒前
3秒前
齐水告发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
33完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
科目三应助晚意采纳,获得10
5秒前
含蓄的哈密瓜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
RoyChen发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小七完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
hxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
地瓜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
乌拉拉啦啦啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
wu完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
安然发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
研友完成签到,获得积分0
16秒前
爱吃的月半猫完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
19秒前
谨慎采白完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
22秒前
CipherSage应助海棠采纳,获得10
23秒前
RoyChen完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
zhoujin发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小哀完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
齐水告完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
yy发布了新的文献求助50
25秒前
27秒前
大个应助hhy采纳,获得30
29秒前
陆雪发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
算命的发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
zhoujin完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
37秒前
haha完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
43秒前
刘柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
学术乌龟完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
酷波er应助安然采纳,获得10
47秒前
夕沫发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
48秒前
香蕉觅云应助Aurora采纳,获得10
48秒前
高分求助中
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 500
Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy 10th Edition 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Mechanical Support: Principles and Practice, Fifth Edition 400
Circular Polar Constellations Providing Continuous Single or Multiple Coverage Above a Specified Latitude 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6763749
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8490147
关于积分的说明 18093503
捐赠科研通 6051691
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3011794
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1988514
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1964284