Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 致盲 随机对照试验 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护医学 急诊医学 儿科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Fabienne Gebistorf,Oliver Karam,Jørn Wetterslev,Arash Afshari
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2018 (12) 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002787.pub3
摘要

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
周美言完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
研友_LwlNdn发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
梵高线上完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
WH应助SHENJINBING采纳,获得30
4秒前
6秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
miss张应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
miss张应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Au_应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
万能图书馆应助灵巧易蓉采纳,获得10
8秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
兮颜发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
鼻毛好胜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
LifeOnMars完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
LYH应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
顾矜应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
思源应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
充电宝应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
CodeCraft应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
852应助埃文采纳,获得10
15秒前
轩xuan完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
今后应助吉吉大王采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
时透完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
LifeOnMars发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Au_应助初景采纳,获得10
19秒前
陆家麟发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
哈哈王子发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
盛夏完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
天tian完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
咳嗽・喀痰の診療ガイドライン第2版2025 800
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
The globalisation of real estate: the politics and practice of foreign real estate investment 500
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7015024
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8688167
关于积分的说明 18417567
捐赠科研通 6503589
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3106698
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2177415
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2082583