Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 致盲 随机对照试验 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护医学 急诊医学 儿科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Fabienne Gebistorf,Oliver Karam,Jørn Wetterslev,Arash Afshari
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2018 (12) 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002787.pub3
摘要

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
霜二完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
LXX-k完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
华仔应助zzz采纳,获得10
1秒前
虚幻姒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
dou完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
学术学习发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
甜北枳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
byyyy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
多情的灵安完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
华仔应助HappyStarCat采纳,获得10
3秒前
zxzxzxzxzx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
战斗暴龙兽完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
蓝豆子完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
小海豹完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
江鹿柒柒发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
自觉的傥完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Sandy应助三三来此采纳,获得20
4秒前
4秒前
小邢一定行完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ben完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
GingerF应助顺利的快乐小猪采纳,获得30
6秒前
梵高完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小恐龙飞飞完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
快乐的水杯完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
北冰洋的夜晚An完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
打卡下班完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
hkhk完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Delili完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
乐乐完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
17完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
迷路的小蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
郭志倩完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
乐园鸟完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
花花公子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
糊辣鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
兴奋的蜡烛完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
楚舜华完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 500
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3953597
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3499217
关于积分的说明 11094578
捐赠科研通 3229785
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1785744
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 869499
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 801478