Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 致盲 随机对照试验 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护医学 急诊医学 儿科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Fabienne Gebistorf,Oliver Karam,Jørn Wetterslev,Arash Afshari
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2018 (12) 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002787.pub3
摘要

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Hello应助东是东南的东采纳,获得10
2秒前
李自律发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
他有篮完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
小马甲应助ttt123采纳,获得10
3秒前
339完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大意的不斜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
一只白色的小鸡仔完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助文艺的冬卉采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Zoe_Zhang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
psyYang发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
鲤鱼雨泽发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
NexusExplorer应助eko采纳,获得10
13秒前
耍酷的玉米关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
今天是周六六完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
深情安青应助1号采纳,获得10
13秒前
天下无双发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
王升亮完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
邓木发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
善良未来完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Hello应助吔94采纳,获得10
16秒前
皇上嗳完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
Orange应助旷意采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
沿海地带应助加油的小白采纳,获得10
19秒前
是多少完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Rex发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Electrode Potentials 550
REAL-WORLD EFFICACY AND GENOMIC LANDSCAPE OF POLATUZUMA VEDOTIN-BASED FIRST-LINE THERAPY IN DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA: A FOCUS ON TP53 MUTATIONS AND TREATMENT RESPONSE 500
Handbook of Luminescence Dating 500
Safety Pharmacology 500
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6956205
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8639709
关于积分的说明 18321082
捐赠科研通 6401881
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3083951
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2130779
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2060706