Inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children and adults

医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 致盲 随机对照试验 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 重症监护医学 急诊医学 儿科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Fabienne Gebistorf,Oliver Karam,Jørn Wetterslev,Arash Afshari
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:2018 (12) 被引量:266
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002787.pub3
摘要

Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and mostly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are critical conditions. AHRF results from several systemic conditions and is associated with high mortality and morbidity in individuals of all ages. Inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has been used to improve oxygenation, but its role remains controversial. This Cochrane review was originally published in 2003, and has been updated in 2010 and 2016.The primary objective was to examine the effects of administration of inhaled nitric oxide on mortality in adults and children with ARDS. Secondary objectives were to examine secondary outcomes such as pulmonary bleeding events, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, etc. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analyses (TSAs) to examine the level of evidence.In this update, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 Issue 11); MEDLINE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), EMBASE (Ovid SP, to 18 November 2015), CAB, BIOSIS and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). We handsearched the reference lists of the newest reviews and cross-checked them with our search of MEDLINE. We contacted the main authors of included studies to request any missed, unreported or ongoing studies. The search was run from inception until 18 November 2015.We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language. We contacted trial investigators and study authors to retrieve relevant and missing data.Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Our primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We performed several subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of INO in adults and children and on various clinical and physiological outcomes. We presented pooled estimates of the effects of interventions as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of bias through assessment of trial methodological components and risk of random error through trial sequential analysis.Our primary objective was to assess effects of INO on mortality. We found no statistically significant effects of INO on longest follow-up mortality: 250/654 deaths (38.2%) in the INO group compared with 221/589 deaths (37.5%) in the control group (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.19; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). We found no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality at 28 days: 202/587 deaths (34.4%) in the INO group compared with 166/518 deaths (32.0%) in the control group (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27; I² statistic = 0%; moderate quality of evidence). In children, there was no statistically significant effects of INO on mortality: 25/89 deaths (28.1%) in the INO group compared with 34/96 deaths (35.4%) in the control group (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.18; I² statistic = 22%; moderate quality of evidence).Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of INO. For partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), we found significant improvement at 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 15.91, 95% CI 8.25 to 23.56; I² statistic = 25%; 11 trials, 614 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For the oxygenation index, we noted significant improvement at 24 hours (MD -2.31, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.89; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 368 participants; moderate quality of evidence). For ventilator-free days, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.82 to 0.69; I² statistic = 0%; five trials, 804 participants; high quality of evidence). There was a statistically significant increase in renal failure in the INO groups (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16; I² statistic = 0%; high quality of evidence).Evidence is insufficient to support INO in any category of critically ill patients with AHRF. Inhaled nitric oxide results in a transient improvement in oxygenation but does not reduce mortality and may be harmful, as it seems to increase renal impairment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
眯眯眼的太兰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
思源应助我爱山之东采纳,获得10
2秒前
英勇含烟完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
YY关闭了YY文献求助
3秒前
3秒前
心灵美的不斜完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
刘金磊完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Moro完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
Wei发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
songif发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
平常代真完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
芳芳驳回了reirei应助
7秒前
yzy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Mr_Y完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
田様应助MMM采纳,获得10
9秒前
mingior完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
香蕉觅云应助小鱼转晴采纳,获得10
9秒前
177发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Abhinesh完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
zxsv完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
元谷雪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
乾雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
爱科研发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
自成完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Likz完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
陈磨磨磨完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
壮壮不爱吃肉完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
songif完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
Akim应助177采纳,获得10
15秒前
Wangguanbo发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7531041
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9116753
关于积分的说明 19473442
捐赠科研通 7131448
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3256384
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2424036
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2244012