作者
Mikkel Østergaard,Ronald van Vollenhoven,Anna Rudin,Merete Lund Hetland,Marte Schrumpf Heiberg,Dan Nordström,Michael T Nurmohamed,Björn Guðbjörnsson,Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg,Pernille Bøyesen,K. Lend,Kim Hørslev‐Petersen,Till Uhlig,Tuulikki Sokka,Gerður Gröndal,Simon Krabbe,Joakim Lindqvist,Inger Gjertsson,Daniel Glinatsi,Meliha C Kapetanovic,Anna‐Birgitte Aga,Francesca Faustini,Pinja Parmanne,Tove Lorenzen,Giovanni Cagnotto,Johan Back,Oliver Hendricks,Daisy Vedder,T. Rannio,Emma Grenholm,Anna‐Birgitte Aga,Eli Brodin,Hanne Lindegaard,Annika Söderbergh,Milad Rizk,Alf Kastbom,Per Larsson,Line Uhrenholt,Søren Andreas Just,David Stevens,Trine Bay Laurbjerg,Gunnstein Bakland,Inge Christoffer Olsen,Espen A Haavardsholm,Jon Lampa
摘要
The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action.Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025).Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences.The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%.Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments.NCT01491815.