医学
治疗性血浆置换
败血症
感染性休克
荟萃分析
系统回顾
内科学
严重败血症
休克(循环)
重症监护医学
梅德林
政治学
法学
作者
Olive Pei Ee Lee,Nalaayeni Kanesan,Esther Huimin Leow,Rehena Sultana,Yek K. Chor,Chin Seng Gan,Jan Hau Lee
标识
DOI:10.1177/08850666231170775
摘要
Objectives To summarize the role of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill adults and children with severe sepsis. Data collection A systematic search was performed using the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane from January 1990 till December 2022. Comparative studies of TPE in severe sepsis were selected. Adult and pediatric data were analyzed separately. Data synthesis Eight randomized control trials and 6 observational studies (n = 50,142 patients) were included. Centrifugal TPE was the most common modality (209/280, 74.6% adults and 952/1026, 92.7% children). Every TPE study utilized different volume exchanges. Most TPE sessions (1173/1306, 89.8%) employed fresh frozen plasma (FFP) as replacement fluid and heparin as anticoagulant. Adults with severe sepsis supported with TPE using FFP had lower mortality (risk ratio, RR: 0.64 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.49, 0.84]) compared to those who did not. In contrast, TPE was associated with increased mortality in septic children without thrombocytopenia-associated multiorgan failure ( RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.93, 2.57). There was no difference in outcomes in patients supported with centrifugal and membrane TPE. In both populations, patients supported on TPE as a continuous regime had poorer outcome. Conclusion Current evidence indicates that TPE is a potential adjunct therapy in adults with severe sepsis but not in children.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI