Quantitative analysis of the minimum days of dietary survey to estimate dietary pesticide exposure: Implications for dietary pesticide sampling strategy

杀虫剂 动物科学 毒理 农药残留 医学 生物 农学
作者
Ang Li,Ming Yang,Yayuan Mei,Quan Zhou,Jiaxin Zhao,Yanbing Li,Kai Li,Meiduo Zhao,Jing Xu,Qun Xu
出处
期刊:Environmental Pollution [Elsevier]
卷期号:329: 121630-121630 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121630
摘要

Populations are exposed to pesticides through diet on a daily basis. However, there is no research guiding how to evaluate dietary pesticide exposure, and researchers used 1-day, 3-days, 7-days or even longer dietary survey to evaluate without any consensus. It is important for dietary pesticide evaluation to identify the minimum survey days. To increase knowledge of this, a data combination was applied between a two-wave consecutive repeated-measures study in Baoding City and the Fifth China Total Diet Study. Further policy consistency on pesticides were evaluated to explain its credibility. We computed the sensitivity and specificity to evaluate how well different days of dietary survey classify participants with high exposure, and calculated the minimum days required to estimate the participant-specific mean at different acceptable error range. With 1 day of dietary survey, the classification sensitivity was low (<0.6) for total HCH, endosulfan, chlordane, cyhalothrin, allethrin, and prallethrin; that for the other pesticides was high sensitivity (≥0.6). Sensitivity increased as the number of days increased, and the maximum marginal sensitivity increase (≥0.039) occurred from 1 to 2 days for all pesticides except phenothrin, whose maximum marginal sensitivity increase (0.042) occurred from 2 to 3 days. The specificity increased gradually from 0.8 to 0.9 from 1 to 7 days. Under the acceptable error range of 0.5%, 3–28 days were required for participant-specific mean estimation and 1–7 days were required when acceptable error range was shrunk in 1%. Only 1 day was enough if 5% error range was acceptable. In conclusion, 3 days in the study period was cost-effective to distinguish high exposure group, and it rose to 7 when estimating participant-specific mean from a conservative perspective. This study can serve as a reference to determine the minimum survey days for epidemiological studies employing dietary surveys.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
3秒前
海棠朵朵发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
SciGPT应助耿耿采纳,获得10
3秒前
Ahha发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助YC采纳,获得10
8秒前
adrenline发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
kento发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
天真的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
午见千山应助顺利的若云采纳,获得20
10秒前
dwl完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
dropwater完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
小黄发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
16秒前
刘闹闹完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
小二郎应助弥叶十厥采纳,获得10
17秒前
精明一寡发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
栗子完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
proteinpurify发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Qiu完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
仲达发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
SMLW完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
adrenline完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
脑洞疼应助枯藤老柳树采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
隐形曼青应助成就猫咪采纳,获得10
32秒前
大模型应助沉默的钻石采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
小琦琦发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
fh发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
文静的银耳汤完成签到,获得积分20
39秒前
40秒前
40秒前
40秒前
高分求助中
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
宽禁带半导体紫外光电探测器 388
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3142116
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2793064
关于积分的说明 7805155
捐赠科研通 2449387
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303185
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626807
版权声明 601291