位于
清晰
透视图(图形)
可靠性
构造(python库)
领域(数学)
面子(社会学概念)
社会学
工程伦理学
公共关系
政治学
工程类
社会科学
化学
程序设计语言
法学
纯数学
人工智能
生物化学
计算机科学
数学
作者
Maximilian Heimstädt,Tomi Koljonen,Kasper Trolle Elmholdt
标识
DOI:10.5465/annals.2022.0078
摘要
Management scholars and practitioners have a longstanding interest in expertise and its benefits for individuals, organizations, and markets. However, today, experts and expertise also face a significant and broad crisis of credibility, authority, and trust in society. In order to better examine, understand, and realize the potential of expertise in and around organizations, our field is overdue for a comprehensive review of recent work on the concept. With an integrative review of the past two decades of management research on expertise, we map out this fragmented field and outline three perspectives on the concept. A "realist perspective" sees expertise as a substantive ability of individuals, a "constructivist perspective" sees expertise as socially constructed quality of collective actors, and a "situationist perspective" sees expertise as a situated enactment involving human and nonhuman actors. These perspectives make different assumptions about the nature of expertise and therefore reach different conclusions about its benefits and problems. By teasing out similarities and differences across the perspectives, we work toward greater construct clarity and develop six integrative opportunities for future research. We conclude with suggestions about how each of the three perspectives can help us better understand the crisis of expertise.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI