医学
吉西他滨
伊立替康
内科学
粘膜炎
养生
氟尿嘧啶
胃肠病学
不利影响
肿瘤科
化疗
癌症
结直肠癌
作者
Cheng‐Yu Tang,Shih‐Hung Yang,Chung‐Pin Li,Yung‐Yeh Su,Sz-Chi Chiu,Li‐Yuan Bai,Yan‐Shen Shan,Li‐Tzong Chen,Shih‐Chang Chuang,De-Chuan Chan,Chia‐Jui Yen,Cheng‐Ming Peng,Tai‐Jan Chiu,Yen‐Yang Chen,Jen‐Shi Chen,Nai‐Jung Chiang,Wen‐Chi Chou
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.014
摘要
Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study. In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018–2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02). The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI