医学
指南
宫颈癌
质量(理念)
家庭医学
医学教育
妇科
癌症
内科学
病理
哲学
认识论
作者
Engin Yurtçu,Seyfettin Ozvural,Betül Keyif
摘要
Abstract Objective To analyze the knowledge of ChatGPT about cervical cancer (CC). Methods Official websites of professional health institutes, and websites created by patients and charities underwent strict screening. Using CC‐related keywords, common inquiries by the public and comments about CC were searched in social media applications with these data, a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) was prepared. When preparing question about CC, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and European Society of Pathology (ESP) guidelines were used. The answers given by ChatGPT were scored according to the Global Quality Score (GQS). Results When all ChatGPT answers to FAQs about CC were evaluated with regard to GQS, 68 ChatGPT answers were classified as score 5, and none of ChatGPT answers for FAQs were scored as 2 or 1. Moreover, ChatGPT answered 33 of 53 (62.3%) CC‐related questions based on ESGO, ESTRO, and ESP guidelines with completely accurate and satisfactory responses (GQS 5). In addition, eight answers (15.1%), seven answers (13.2%), four answers (7.5%), and one answer (1.9%) were categorized as GQS 4, GQS 3, GQS 2, and GQS 1, respectively. The reproducibility rate of ChatGPT answers about CC‐related FAQs and responses about those guideline‐based questions was 93.2% and 88.7%, respectively. Conclusion ChatGPT had an accurate and satisfactory response rate for FAQs about CC with regards to GQS. However, the accuracy and quality of ChatGPT answers significantly decreased for questions based on guidelines.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI