医学
格拉斯哥昏迷指数
沙发评分
重症监护室
阿帕奇II
回顾性队列研究
内科学
比例危险模型
急性肾损伤
重症监护
危险系数
损伤严重程度评分
疾病严重程度
急诊医学
重症监护医学
外科
毒物控制
伤害预防
置信区间
作者
Li Zhong,Ming Wu,Jingjing Ji,Zhifeng Liu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.042
摘要
Despite a growing understanding of exertional heatstroke (EHS), there is a paucity of clinical evidence for risk-stratification of patients with EHS. The objective of this study was to identify an appropriate scoring system for prognostic assessment of EHS.This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with EHS admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of the General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA between October 2008 and May 2019. Inflammatory indices and organ function parameters at admission, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were collected. Risk factors for 90-day mortality were identified using multivariate Cox proportional hazard risk regression model.189 patients (all male) were finally included, with a median age of 21.0 years (IQR 19.0-27.0), median APACHE II score of 11.0 (IQR 8.0-16.0), median SOFA score of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-6.0), and median GCS score of 12.0 (IQR 7.0-14.0). There were 166 survivors (87.8%) and 23 non-survivors (12.2%). Compared with survivor group, non-survivors had higher incidence of severe organ damage, including rhabdomyolysis (46.1% vs 63.6%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (25.6% vs 90.0%), acute liver injury (69.4% vs 95.7%), and acute kidney injury (36.6% vs 95.7%). Multivariate Cox risk regression model showed that SOFA score was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality, with an optimal cutoff score of 7.5.SOFA score may be a clinically useful predictor of death in EHS. Prospective studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of SOFA score and the optimal cutoff level.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI