Comparison of DeNovix, NanoDrop and Qubit for DNA quantification and impurity detection of bacterial DNA extracts

DNA 色谱法 化学 DNA提取 分光光度法 核酸 基因组DNA 分子生物学 生物 聚合酶链反应 生物化学 基因
作者
Nick Versmessen,Leen Van Simaey,Abel Abera Negash,Marjolein Vandekerckhove,Paco Hulpiau,Mario Vaneechoutte,Piet Cools
出处
期刊:PLOS ONE [Public Library of Science]
卷期号:19 (6): e0305650-e0305650
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0305650
摘要

Accurate DNA quantification is key for downstream application including library preparations for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the quantification of standards for quantitative PCR. Two commonly used technologies for nucleic acid quantification are based on spectrometry, such as NanoDrop, and fluorometry, such as Qubit. The DS–11+ Series spectrophotometer/fluorometer (DeNovix) is a UV spectrophotometry-based instrument and is a relatively new spectrophotometric method but has not yet been compared to established platforms. Here, we compared three DNA quantification platforms, including two UV spectrophotometry-based techniques (DeNovix and NanoDrop) and one fluorometry-based approach (Qubit). We used genomic prokaryotic DNA extracted from Streptococcus pneumoniae using a Roche DNA extraction kit. We also evaluated purity assessment and effect of a single freeze-thaw cycle. Spectrophotometry-based methods reported 3 to 4-fold higher mean DNA concentrations compared to Qubit, both before and after freezing. The ratio of DNA concentrations assessed by spectrophotometry on the one hand, and Qubit on the other hand, was function of the A 260/280 . In case DNA was pure (A 260/280 between 1.7 and 2.0), the ratio DeNovix or Nanodrop vs. Qubit was close or equal to 2, while this ratio showed an incline for DNA with increasing A 260/280 values > 2.0. The A 260/280 and A 260/230 purity ratios exhibited negligible variation across spectrophotometric methods and freezing conditions. The comparison of DNA concentrations from before and after freezing revealed no statistically significant disparities for each technique. DeNovix exhibited the highest Spearman correlation coefficient (0.999), followed by NanoDrop (0.81), and Qubit (0.77). In summary, there is no difference between DeNovix and NanoDrop in estimated gDNA concentrations of S . pneumoniae , and the spectrophotometry methods estimated close or equal to 2 times higher concentrations compared to Qubit for pure DNA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wh完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
无误发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
落寞归尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
缓慢的访枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
阿尼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
W_RH完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
丘比特应助四月采纳,获得10
2秒前
yyc666发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助u深度采纳,获得10
2秒前
科目三应助xiaolan采纳,获得10
2秒前
敏1997发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
sunburst完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
上官若男应助987采纳,获得10
3秒前
天天天蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
安诺发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
CipherSage应助小半采纳,获得10
5秒前
李健的小迷弟应助冬寒采纳,获得10
5秒前
耀学菜菜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
完美世界应助无误采纳,获得10
7秒前
赘婿应助风色幻想采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
haha完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
可爱书竹完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
佰斯特威应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
劲秉应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
MchemG应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助lxy采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助lxy采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI5应助lxy采纳,获得30
13秒前
淡然水绿完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Wu完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
az完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
耀学菜菜完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
HUAJIAO发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
いちばんやさしい生化学 500
Skin Tissue Engineering Methods and Protocols Book May 2025 300
Avialinguistics:The Study of Language for Aviation Purposes 270
Starvation biology of Plutella xylostella from a post-harvest crop sanitation perspective 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3688268
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3237989
关于积分的说明 9834999
捐赠科研通 2950127
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1617772
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 764532
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 738595