An exploration and advancement of the concept of trust

概念化 成熟度(心理) 认识论 形式概念分析 过程(计算) 概念图 领域 纪律 概念框架 社会学 心理学 工程伦理学 计算机科学 社会科学 数学教育 人工智能 发展心理学 哲学 算法 政治学 法学 工程类 操作系统
作者
Judith E. Hupcey,Janice Penrod,Janice M. Morse,Carl Mitcham
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
卷期号:36 (2): 282-293 被引量:228
标识
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01970.x
摘要

An exploration and advancement of the concept of trust Background. Trust is a concept used both in everyday language and in the scientific realm. An exploration of the conceptualizations of trust within the disciplines of nursing, medicine, psychology and sociology, revealed that trust is an ambiguous scientific concept. Aims. In order to increase the pragmatic utility of the concept of trust for scientific application, further clarification and development of the concept was undertaken. Methods. First, a concept analysis was conducted with the aim of clarifying the state of the science of discipline‐specific conceptualizations of trust. The criterion‐based method of concept analysis as described by Morse and colleagues was used ( Morse et al. 1996a , 1996b , Morse 2000 ). This analytic process enabled the assessment of the scientific maturity of the concept of trust. The interdisciplinary concept of trust was found to be immature. Based on this level of maturity it was determined that in order to advance the concept of trust toward greater maturity, techniques of concept development using the literature as data were applied. In this process, questions were ‘asked of the data’ (in this case, the selected disciplinary literatures) to identify the conceptual components of trust. Results. The inquiry into the concept of trust led to the development of an expanded interdisciplinary conceptual definition by merging the most coherent commonalties from each discipline. Conclusions. The newly developed interdisciplinary conceptualization advances the concept toward maturity, that is, a more refined, pragmatic and higher‐order concept. The refined concept of trust transcends the contextual boundaries of each discipline in a truly interdisciplinary scientific fashion.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
儒雅的从云完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zero关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
华仔应助李点点采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
狄语蕊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
田様应助yuiaa采纳,获得10
6秒前
旺德福发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
Hello应助Charles采纳,获得10
9秒前
Hello应助李点点采纳,获得10
11秒前
JoeJ应助Siriya采纳,获得10
12秒前
romeo完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
tomorrow完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
开朗月饼完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
华仔应助李点点采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
典雅的雪糕完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
25秒前
自然发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
范月月完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
28秒前
Hyux发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
LJ完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
爆米花应助李点点采纳,获得10
33秒前
怡然的寻桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
鱿鱼完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
38秒前
40秒前
41秒前
42秒前
英姑应助杜琦采纳,获得10
42秒前
43秒前
天天快乐应助执c丶采纳,获得10
43秒前
45秒前
46秒前
钱多多发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation 2000
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger Heßler, Claudia, Rud 1000
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 1000
Natural History of Mantodea 螳螂的自然史 1000
A Photographic Guide to Mantis of China 常见螳螂野外识别手册 800
How Maoism Was Made: Reconstructing China, 1949-1965 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 冶金 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3318402
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2949819
关于积分的说明 8548151
捐赠科研通 2626513
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1437229
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 666193
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 652133