已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Endoscopic Duodenal–Jejunal Bypass Liner Rapidly Improves Plasma Parameters of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

非酒精性脂肪肝 内科学 胃肠病学 医学 内分泌学 2型糖尿病 脂肪肝 糖尿病 疾病
作者
Charlotte de Jonge,Sander S. Rensen,Ger H. Koek,Mandy F. Joosten,Wim A. Buurman,Nicole D. Bouvy,Jan Greve
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (11): 1517-1520 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.029
摘要

Bariatric surgery reduces nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the effects of duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL), nonsurgical bariatric device, on plasma parameters of NAFLD. Seventeen obese subjects with type 2 diabetes received the DJBL for 24 weeks. Before, during, and after DJBL implantation, we determined plasma levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), albumin, caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), and liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP). At baseline, subjects had increased levels of AST (35 ± 4 IU/L), ALT (54 ± 5 IU/L), and γ-GT (66 ± 14 IU/L), compared with healthy individuals; subjects’ mean concentrations of caspase-cleaved CK-18 and L-FABP were 214.4 ± 35.6 U/L and 29.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL, respectively. Three months after implantation of DJBL, all NAFLD-related parameters had decreased from baseline (AST, 28 ± 3 IU/L; ALT, 32 ± 2 IU/L; γ-GT, 44 ±7 IU/L; caspase-cleaved CK-18, 140.6 ± 16.3U/L; and L-FABP, 18.2 ± 1.5 ng/mL; all P < .05). After 6 months, levels of ALT and γ-GT had further decreased (ALT, 28 ± 2 IU/L and γ-GT, 35 ± 5 IU/L), whereas levels of AST, caspase-cleaved CK-18, and L-FABP had stabilized (P = not significant). Six months after DJBLs were removed, levels of ALT (37 ± 3 IU/L), γ-GT (42 ± 5 IU/L), and caspase-cleaved CK-18 (124.5 ± 12.5U/L) were still reduced (P < .05), whereas AST and L-FABP had returned to near baseline levels (P = not significant). Therefore, in obese subjects, DJBL reduces plasma parameters of NAFLD. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT00985114. Bariatric surgery reduces nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the effects of duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL), nonsurgical bariatric device, on plasma parameters of NAFLD. Seventeen obese subjects with type 2 diabetes received the DJBL for 24 weeks. Before, during, and after DJBL implantation, we determined plasma levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), albumin, caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), and liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP). At baseline, subjects had increased levels of AST (35 ± 4 IU/L), ALT (54 ± 5 IU/L), and γ-GT (66 ± 14 IU/L), compared with healthy individuals; subjects’ mean concentrations of caspase-cleaved CK-18 and L-FABP were 214.4 ± 35.6 U/L and 29.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL, respectively. Three months after implantation of DJBL, all NAFLD-related parameters had decreased from baseline (AST, 28 ± 3 IU/L; ALT, 32 ± 2 IU/L; γ-GT, 44 ±7 IU/L; caspase-cleaved CK-18, 140.6 ± 16.3U/L; and L-FABP, 18.2 ± 1.5 ng/mL; all P < .05). After 6 months, levels of ALT and γ-GT had further decreased (ALT, 28 ± 2 IU/L and γ-GT, 35 ± 5 IU/L), whereas levels of AST, caspase-cleaved CK-18, and L-FABP had stabilized (P = not significant). Six months after DJBLs were removed, levels of ALT (37 ± 3 IU/L), γ-GT (42 ± 5 IU/L), and caspase-cleaved CK-18 (124.5 ± 12.5U/L) were still reduced (P < .05), whereas AST and L-FABP had returned to near baseline levels (P = not significant). Therefore, in obese subjects, DJBL reduces plasma parameters of NAFLD. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT00985114. Recently, a nonsurgical bariatric technique, the duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) (GI Dynamics, Lexington, MA), was developed. The initial purpose of the DJBL was to treat obesity.1Schouten R. Rijs C.S. Bouvy N.D. et al.A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery.Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 236-243Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google Scholar Remarkably, this device turned out to not only lead to significant weight loss but also to rapid improvement of type 2 diabetes.2Escalona A. Pimentel F. Sharp A. et al.Weight loss and metabolic improvement in morbidly obese subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner.Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 1080-1085Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, 3de Jonge C. Rensen S.S. Verdam F.J. et al.Endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner rapidly improves type 2 diabetes.Obes Surg. 2013; 23: 1354-1360Crossref PubMed Scopus (123) Google Scholar Because both conditions are important risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)4Angulo P. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Nutrition Reviews. 2007; 65: 63Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 5Lazo M. Clark J.M. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective.Semin Liver Dis. 2008; 28: 339-350Crossref PubMed Scopus (582) Google Scholar and previous research with surgical bariatric techniques has revealed beneficial effects on NAFLD,6Blackburn G.L. Mun E.C. Effects of weight loss surgeries on liver disease.Semin Liver Dis. 2004; 24: 371-379Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 7Mattar S.G. Velcu L.M. Rabinovitz M. et al.Surgically-induced weight loss significantly improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome.Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 610-620Crossref PubMed Scopus (295) Google Scholar, 8Mathurin P. Hollebecque A. Arnalsteen L. et al.Prospective study of the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on liver injury in patients without advanced disease.Gastroenterology. 2009; 137: 532-540Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (388) Google Scholar, 9Rabl C. Campos G.M. The impact of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Semin Liver Dis. 2012; 32: 80-91Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar we hypothesized that DJBL treatment would also have a favorable impact on NAFLD. We therefore investigated the effect of DJBL treatment on plasma parameters that have been linked to NAFLD. Changes in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), and albumin in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes before, during, and after DJBL treatment are reported. Seventeen subjects with obesity and type 2 diabetes were included in the study by the Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and the Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, the Netherlands. Inclusion criteria were age 18–65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30–50 kg/m2, duration of type 2 diabetes <10 years, and glycosylated hemoglobin 7.5%–10.0%. Main exclusion criteria were alcohol consumption >1 unit/day for women or >2 units/day for men, weight loss >4.5 kg within 12 weeks before screening, use of weight loss medication or anti-inflammatory drugs, history of inflammatory diseases or other known liver diseases than NAFLD, and exclusion criteria regarding DJBL compatibility. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of each center and conducted according to the revised version of the Declaration of Helsinki (October 2008, Seoul). Written informed consent was obtained before study participation. Subjects were treated with the DJBL for 24 weeks. The DJBL was delivered and retrieved endoscopically as described previously.1Schouten R. Rijs C.S. Bouvy N.D. et al.A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery.Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 236-243Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google Scholar Subjects were provided a standard of care nutritional counseling program, which suggested a regular diet with a maximum of 1200 kcal for women and 1500 kcal for men that was liquid for the first week after DJBL placement. Dietary adaptations were made during follow-up if necessary. Subjects were studied on 4 occasions: within 1 month before the start of the study (D0), 3 and 6 months after implantation of the DJBL (M3 and M6, respectively), and again 6 months after explantation of the DJBL (M12). The baseline visit included physical examination and history taking. At all study visits, body weight was determined, and fasting venous blood samples were collected (BD Vacutainer EDTA tube; BD Diagnostics, Erembodegem-Aalst, Belgium). Samples were immediately cooled, centrifuged, and stored at –80°C until further analysis. Plasma levels of AST, ALT, γ-GT, albumin, and glycosylated hemoglobin were determined routinely at the Department of Clinical Chemistry at the Maastricht University Medical Center. Reference limits can be found in Table 1.Table 1Baseline Characteristics of the Study PopulationD0, baselineM3, treatmentM6, treatmentM12, after treatmentReference limitWeight (kg)116.0 ± 5.8105.3 ± 5.5103.3 ± 5.5106.7 ± 6.1BMI (kg/m2)37.0 ± 1.333.6 ± 1.232.9 ± 1.234.3 ± 1.5AST (IU/L)35 ± 428 ± 323 ± 234 ± 3Male <35; female <30ALT (IU/L)54 ± 532 ± 228 ± 237 ± 3Male <45; female <35γ-GT (IU/L)66 ± 1444 ± 735 ± 542 ± 5Male <55; female <40L-FABP (ng/mL)29.3 ± 2.618.2 ± 1.520.2 ± 1.629.5 ± 3.1CK-18 (U/L)214.4 ± 35.6140.6 ± 16.3149.2 ± 23.1124.5 ± 12.5NOTE. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean. Open table in a new tab NOTE. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean. Recent reports indicate that plasma levels of caspase-cleaved CK-18 reflect hepatocyte apoptosis and are closely related to NAFLD severity.10Wieckowska A. Zein N.N. Yerian L.M. et al.In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatology. 2006; 44: 27-33Crossref PubMed Scopus (585) Google Scholar, 11Diab D.L. Yerian L. Schauer P. et al.Cytokeratin 18 fragment levels as a noninvasive biomarker for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric surgery patients.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 1249-1254Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar, 12Feldstein A. Wieckowska A. Lopez A. et al.Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study.Hepatology. 2009; 50: 1072-1078Crossref PubMed Scopus (545) Google Scholar, 13Shen J. Chan H.L. Wong G.L. et al.Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers.J Hepatol. 2012; 56: 1363-1370Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar We therefore determined this parameter by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (caspase-cleaved CK-18: M30 Apoptosense ELISA; Peviva AB, Bromma, Sweden). In addition, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine plasma L-FABP concentrations (L-FABP ELISA, provided by Hycult Biotechnology, Uden, the Netherlands). Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA). Longitudinal changes were tested by using Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean and standard error of the mean. All co-authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript. At baseline, subjects were aged 51 ± 2 years, and the majority of subjects were male (14 of 17). Additional baseline characteristics of the study subjects and subsequent changes are shown in Table 1. Three months after DJBL implantation, body weight had decreased from 116.0 ± 5.8 to 105.3 ± 5.5 kg, corresponding with an excess weight loss of 25.2% ± 3.1% and a BMI reduction of 3.4 ± 0.4 kg/m2 (P < .01). After 24 weeks at the time of device explantation, weight had further decreased to 103.3 ± 5.5 kg, resulting in a total weight loss of 12.7 ± 1.3 kg, corresponding to an excess weight loss of 29.8% ± 3.5% and a BMI reduction of 4.1 ± 0.4 kg/m2 (P < .01). Six months after explantation of the device (M12), body weight had increased slightly to 106.7 ± 6.1 kg but was still significantly decreased when compared with baseline (P < .01). BMI and excess weight loss were 34.3 ± 1.5 kg/m2 and 19.9% ± 3.9%, respectively. To gain insight into the potential effects of DJBL treatment on NAFLD, several established clinical plasma parameters that have been linked to NAFLD14Wieckowska A. McCullough A.J. Feldstein A.E. Noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: present and future.Hepatology. 2007; 46: 582-589Crossref PubMed Scopus (364) Google Scholar, 15Neuschwander-Tetri B.A. Clark J.M. Bass N.M. et al.Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatology. 2010; 52: 913-924Crossref PubMed Scopus (363) Google Scholar were evaluated. At baseline, mean plasma AST level was 35 ± 4 IU/L (Figure 1A). In addition, plasma ALT and γ-GT were above the upper reference limits (54 ± 5 IU/L and 66 ± 14 IU/L, respectively; Figure 1B and C). Three months after DJBL implantation, plasma AST had decreased from 35 ± 4 to 28 ± 3 IU/L (P < .05). AST levels continued to decrease, and 6 months after implantation the mean AST level was 23 ± 2 IU/L (P < .01). Furthermore, a significant reduction in ALT levels was observed from 54 ± 5 at baseline to 32 ± 2 IU/L after 3 months and to 28 ± 2 IU/L after 6 months (both P < .01). The γ-GT levels also decreased from 66 ± 14 IU/L at baseline to 44 ± 7 and 35 ± 5 IU/L at 3 and 6 months after DJBL implantation, respectively (both P < .01). Six months after explantation of the device at month 12, AST had increased and returned to baseline levels (34 ± 3 IU/L, P = .63). In contrast, ALT and γ-GT levels were still diminished (ALT: 37 ± 3 IU/L, γ-GT: 42 ± 5 IU/L; both P < .01). Albumin levels of all subjects, data not shown, stayed within the reference range at all times. The effect of DJBL treatment on NAFLD-related liver damage, reflected by a marker of hepatocyte injury, L-FABP,16Pelsers M.M. Morovat A. Alexander G.J. et al.Liver fatty acid-binding protein as a sensitive serum marker of acute hepatocellular damage in liver transplant recipients.Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 2055-2057Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar is shown in Figure 1D. Plasma L-FABP levels decreased from 29.3 ± 2.6 ng/mL at baseline to 18.2 ± 1.5 ng/mL after 3 months of treatment (P < .01). Until month 6, plasma L-FABP levels stayed at a lower level (20.2 ± 1.6 ng/mL, P < .05). At month 12, six months after device removal, L-FABP levels had returned to baseline level (29.5 ± 3.1 ng/mL, P = .85). We next determined the effect of DJBL treatment on hepatocyte apoptosis, as indicated by plasma caspase-cleaved CK-18 concentrations. Changes in caspase-cleaved CK-18 showed a similar pattern as the changes in L-FABP concentration (Fig. 1E). At baseline, caspase-cleaved CK-18 levels were 214.4 ± 35.6 U/L. After 3 months, the levels had decreased to 140.6 ± 16.3 U/L (P < .05). During the remainder of the study, the decrease in caspase-cleaved CK-18 concentrations stabilized (149.2 ± 23.1 U/L at month 6 and 124.5 ± 12.5 U/L 6 months after DJBL removal; P = .12 and P <.01, respectively). Bariatric surgery effectively treats obesity and also leads to improvement of NAFLD.6Blackburn G.L. Mun E.C. Effects of weight loss surgeries on liver disease.Semin Liver Dis. 2004; 24: 371-379Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 7Mattar S.G. Velcu L.M. Rabinovitz M. et al.Surgically-induced weight loss significantly improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome.Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 610-620Crossref PubMed Scopus (295) Google Scholar, 8Mathurin P. Hollebecque A. Arnalsteen L. et al.Prospective study of the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on liver injury in patients without advanced disease.Gastroenterology. 2009; 137: 532-540Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (388) Google Scholar, 9Rabl C. Campos G.M. The impact of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Semin Liver Dis. 2012; 32: 80-91Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar However, bariatric surgery is invasive and associated with complications, causing a hesitative attitude in patients toward this type of surgery.17Afonso B.B. Rosenthal R. Li K.M. et al.Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010; 6: 16-21Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar Therefore, there is need for less invasive devices like the DJBL. The DJBL has been shown to be safe and effective in treating obesity and different aspects of metabolic syndrome, including type 2 diabetes.1Schouten R. Rijs C.S. Bouvy N.D. et al.A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery.Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 236-243Crossref PubMed Scopus (240) Google Scholar, 2Escalona A. Pimentel F. Sharp A. et al.Weight loss and metabolic improvement in morbidly obese subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner.Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 1080-1085Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, 3de Jonge C. Rensen S.S. Verdam F.J. et al.Endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner rapidly improves type 2 diabetes.Obes Surg. 2013; 23: 1354-1360Crossref PubMed Scopus (123) Google Scholar The effect of DJBL treatment on plasma parameters that are associated with NAFLD was investigated in the current study. We report that plasma liver parameters improve after duodenal-jejunal exclusion by DJBL. In the current study with a minimally invasive bariatric technique, we chose not to expose our subjects to repeated invasive liver biopsies, but instead, plasma parameters reflecting NAFLD were used. Our data show that clinical plasma liver parameters decreased after DJBL implantation. Normalization of AST, ALT, and γ-GT levels occurred in almost all subjects. Dixon et al18Dixon J.B. Bhathal P.S. O'Brien P.E. Weight loss and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: falls in gamma-glutamyl transferase concentrations are associated with histologic improvement.Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 1278-1286Crossref PubMed Scopus (175) Google Scholar have shown that a decrease in γ-GT and AST levels is associated with improvement of liver histology in NAFLD patients after weight loss by bariatric surgery. This advocates for improvement of NAFLD by DJBL treatment in our subjects. In addition, DJBL treatment resulted in diminished plasma levels of L-FABP, a small intracellular protein that rapidly leaks out of damaged hepatocytes into the circulation.16Pelsers M.M. Morovat A. Alexander G.J. et al.Liver fatty acid-binding protein as a sensitive serum marker of acute hepatocellular damage in liver transplant recipients.Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 2055-2057Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar A similar response pattern was observed for caspase-cleaved CK-18. Caspase-cleaved CK-18 is a protein generated during hepatocyte apoptosis, a prominent pathologic feature of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH),19Feldstein A.E. Canbay A. Angulo P. et al.Hepatocyte apoptosis and fas expression are prominent features of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.Gastroenterology. 2003; 125: 437-443Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (865) Google Scholar the more severe form of NAFLD. Plasma levels of caspase-cleaved CK-18 positively correlate with NAFLD severity, independently predicting the presence of NASH.10Wieckowska A. Zein N.N. Yerian L.M. et al.In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatology. 2006; 44: 27-33Crossref PubMed Scopus (585) Google Scholar, 11Diab D.L. Yerian L. Schauer P. et al.Cytokeratin 18 fragment levels as a noninvasive biomarker for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric surgery patients.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6: 1249-1254Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar, 12Feldstein A. Wieckowska A. Lopez A. et al.Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study.Hepatology. 2009; 50: 1072-1078Crossref PubMed Scopus (545) Google Scholar, 13Shen J. Chan H.L. Wong G.L. et al.Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers.J Hepatol. 2012; 56: 1363-1370Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar In our subjects, a decrease in caspase-cleaved CK-18 was observed after initiation of the DJBL treatment, potentially indicating NASH regression. Taken together, all plasma parameters associated with NAFLD improved after DJBL implantation. Interestingly, 6 months after DJBL removal, ALT, γ-GT, and caspase-cleaved CK-18 were still diminished when compared with baseline, suggesting a sustained effect of the DJBL treatment. Notably, NAFLD severity was probably limited in our study population, which was characterized by modest elevation of plasma liver parameters.10Wieckowska A. Zein N.N. Yerian L.M. et al.In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatology. 2006; 44: 27-33Crossref PubMed Scopus (585) Google Scholar, 13Shen J. Chan H.L. Wong G.L. et al.Non-invasive diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by combined serum biomarkers.J Hepatol. 2012; 56: 1363-1370Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (183) Google Scholar The subjects are therefore probably in an early, still reversible stage of NAFLD, when cure through intervention is still possible.20Smith B.W. Adams L.A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011; 48: 97-113Crossref PubMed Scopus (226) Google Scholar In conclusion, a rapid improvement of all NAFLD parameters after initiation of DJBL treatment was observed. It appears that the DJBL reverses liver parameters associated with NAFLD at least temporarily. Further research evaluating longer-term follow-up and/or histologic changes of the liver is needed to fully elaborate the potential positive effect of DJBL treatment on NAFLD. The authors thank the subjects contributing to this trial; the trial nurses Y. Wils and R. Nelissen and the students who helped conduct this research: G. Latten, N. Geubbels, M. de Wolf, T. van der Horst, R. Erbil, B. van der Putten, H. D’Agnolo, and S. Peeters Weem; B. Winkens for statistical assistance; A. A. van Bijnen, B. T. Boonen, and M. Hadfoune for their laboratory assistance; Drs R. J. de Ridder and C. M. Bakker for their help with the DJBL procedures; and Prof Dr A. A. Masclee, Dr J. Maljaars, Y. Slaats, and Dr F. J. Verdam for their help regarding the study design.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
like411发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
个性慕青完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
玉昆完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
李健的小迷弟应助仲滋滋采纳,获得10
5秒前
王某人完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
SHITOU完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Jes发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
半枝桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
仲滋滋完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
咫尺天涯完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
平常的刺猬完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
万能图书馆应助kk采纳,获得10
13秒前
懵懂的子骞完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
咫尺天涯发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
遗梦梦完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
仲滋滋发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
今后应助midokaori采纳,获得10
20秒前
仔仔完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
852应助SHITOU采纳,获得10
23秒前
Jes完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Eason_C完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
Skywalker完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
泡泡完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
肖治民关注了科研通微信公众号
25秒前
大象放冰箱完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
昵称666应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
追忆应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
昵称666应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
追忆应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
追忆应助大家好采纳,获得10
27秒前
helpme完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
HuY完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
cc应助大象放冰箱采纳,获得10
30秒前
清新的谷南完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
程住气完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3956962
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3503011
关于积分的说明 11111001
捐赠科研通 3234007
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1787710
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 870713
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802234