Screening strategies for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

医学 诊断优势比 观察研究 成本效益 心房颤动 优势比 荟萃分析 人口 梅德林 系统回顾 重症监护医学 内科学 风险分析(工程) 政治学 环境卫生 法学
作者
Nicky J. Welton,Alexandra McAleenan,Howard Thom,Philippa Davies,William Hollingworth,Julian P. T. Higgins,George N. Okoli,Jonathan A C Sterne,Gene Feder,Diane Eaton,Aroon D. Hingorani,Christopher G. Fawsitt,Trudie Lobban,Peter Bryden,Alison Richards,Reecha Sofat
出处
期刊:Health Technology Assessment [NIHR Journals Library]
卷期号:21 (29): 1-236 被引量:129
标识
DOI:10.3310/hta21290
摘要

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that increases the risk of thromboembolic events. Anticoagulation therapy to prevent AF-related stroke has been shown to be cost-effective. A national screening programme for AF may prevent AF-related events, but would involve a substantial investment of NHS resources.To conduct a systematic review of the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of screening tests for AF, update a systematic review of comparative studies evaluating screening strategies for AF, develop an economic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies and review observational studies of AF screening to provide inputs to the model.Systematic review, meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.Primary care.Adults.Screening strategies, defined by screening test, age at initial and final screens, screening interval and format of screening {systematic opportunistic screening [individuals offered screening if they consult with their general practitioner (GP)] or systematic population screening (when all eligible individuals are invited to screening)}.Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios; the odds ratio of detecting new AF cases compared with no screening; and the mean incremental net benefit compared with no screening.Two reviewers screened the search results, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A DTA meta-analysis was perfomed, and a decision tree and Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the screening strategies.Diagnostic test accuracy depended on the screening test and how it was interpreted. In general, the screening tests identified in our review had high sensitivity (> 0.9). Systematic population and systematic opportunistic screening strategies were found to be similarly effective, with an estimated 170 individuals needed to be screened to detect one additional AF case compared with no screening. Systematic opportunistic screening was more likely to be cost-effective than systematic population screening, as long as the uptake of opportunistic screening observed in randomised controlled trials translates to practice. Modified blood pressure monitors, photoplethysmography or nurse pulse palpation were more likely to be cost-effective than other screening tests. A screening strategy with an initial screening age of 65 years and repeated screens every 5 years until age 80 years was likely to be cost-effective, provided that compliance with treatment does not decline with increasing age.A national screening programme for AF is likely to represent a cost-effective use of resources. Systematic opportunistic screening is more likely to be cost-effective than systematic population screening. Nurse pulse palpation or modified blood pressure monitors would be appropriate screening tests, with confirmation by diagnostic 12-lead electrocardiography interpreted by a trained GP, with referral to a specialist in the case of an unclear diagnosis. Implementation strategies to operationalise uptake of systematic opportunistic screening in primary care should accompany any screening recommendations.Many inputs for the economic model relied on a single trial [the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly (SAFE) study] and DTA results were based on a few studies at high risk of bias/of low applicability.Comparative studies measuring long-term outcomes of screening strategies and DTA studies for new, emerging technologies and to replicate the results for photoplethysmography and GP interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiography in a screening population.This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013739.The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
nine2652完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
烂漫的睫毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
陈老太完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
宇宇宇c完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
zxt完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
聪明静柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
kimiwanano完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
lu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Profeto应助齐嫒琳采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
从来都不会放弃zr完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
1459完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
行者+完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
GongSyi完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
Boris完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
哭泣笑柳完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
万能图书馆应助大橙子采纳,获得10
28秒前
大眼睛土豆完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
一条虫gg完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
37秒前
40秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
dzy发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
故意的冰淇淋完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
司藤完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
niumi190完成签到,获得积分0
46秒前
温馨完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
东方琉璃完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
50秒前
刘闹闹完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
雅3165完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
56秒前
57秒前
狂野元枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
ruochenzu发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038157
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575869
关于积分的说明 11373842
捐赠科研通 3305650
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022