组内相关
评定量表
共济失调
脊髓小脑共济失调
心理学
等级间信度
克朗巴赫阿尔法
物理疗法
心理测量学
医学
临床心理学
发展心理学
精神科
作者
T. Schmitz-Hübsch,Sophie Tézenas du Montcel,L. Baliko,José Berciano,Sylvia Boesch,Chantal Depondt,Paola Giunti,Christoph Globas,Jon Infante,J.-S. Kang,B. Kremer,Caterina Mariotti,Béla Melegh,M. Pandolfo,Maria Rakowicz,Pascale Ribaı̈,Rafał Rola,Lüdger Schöls,Sandra Szymanski,Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg,Alexandra Dürr,Thomas Klockgether
出处
期刊:Neurology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2006-06-12
卷期号:66 (11): 1717-1720
被引量:1635
标识
DOI:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
摘要
Objective: To develop a reliable and valid clinical scale measuring the severity of ataxia. Methods: The authors devised the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and tested it in two trials of 167 and 119 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia. Results: The mean time to administer SARA in patients was 14.2 ± 7.5 minutes (range 5 to 40). Interrater reliability was high, with an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.98. Test-retest reliability was high with an ICC of 0.90. Internal consistency was high as indicated by Cronbach9s α of 0.94. Factorial analysis revealed that the rating results were determined by a single factor. SARA ratings showed a linear relation to global assessments using a visual analogue scale, suggesting linearity of the scale (p < 0.0001, r2 = 0.98). SARA score increased with the disease stage (p < 0.001) and was closely correlated with the Barthel Index (r = −0.80, p < 0.001) and part IV (functional assessment) of the Unified Huntington9s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS-IV) (r = −0.89, p < 0.0001), whereas it had only a weak correlation with disease duration (r = 0.34, p < 0.0002) Conclusions: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia, making it an appropriate primary outcome measure for clinical trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI