狼牙棒
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
医学
射血分数
内科学
传统PCI
心肌梗塞
心脏病学
危险系数
倾向得分匹配
心力衰竭
置信区间
作者
You-Hong Lee,Jin‐Sun Park,Seung‐Jea Tahk,Gyo-Seung Hwang,Myeong‐Ho Yoon,So‐Yeon Choi,Byoung-Joo Choi,Hong-Seok Lim,Hyoung‐Mo Yang,Kyoung‐Woo Seo,Joon‐Han Shin
出处
期刊:Cardiology
[Karger Publishers]
日期:2015-01-01
卷期号:132 (2): 91-100
被引量:11
摘要
With the present therapeutic advances in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the role of β-blockers in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) has remained contentious.We analyzed the data and clinical outcomes of 901 STEMI patients who had undergone primary PCI. We classified the patients into β-blocker (n = 598) and non-β-blocker groups (n = 303).The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was 10.0% in the β-blocker group and 25.4% in the non-β-blocker group (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 22.1% in the β-blocker group and 34.3% in the non-β-blocker group (p < 0.001). The relative hazard ratio (HR) of β-blockers for all-cause death and MACE with low left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF; <50%) was 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.86, p = 0.009] and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-1.09, p = 0.125), respectively. In patients with normal LVEF (≥50%), the relative HR of β-blockers for death and MACE were 0.50 (95% CI 0.29-0.88, p = 0.016) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-1.12, p = 0.162), respectively. After propensity score matching of the difference of the baseline characteristics, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated lower mortality in the β-blocker group than in the non-β-blocker group with both low LVEF and normal LVEF (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001, respectively).β-Blockers have beneficial clinical outcomes in the era of primary PCI for STEMI, regardless of the LVEF. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI