Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
大气亦巧发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
酒暄发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
徐妮发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
tantan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
gh142132关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
GEEK发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
cslghe发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lx发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
搜集达人应助马梦乐采纳,获得10
4秒前
绿刺猬发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
沐易发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
神奇海螺完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
张一凡完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
zhengweihai完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
酷波er应助绿刺猬采纳,获得10
10秒前
sci01完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
何88888888发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
优pp发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Zhou发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
酷炫熊猫发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
今后应助Zzzzz采纳,获得10
15秒前
会撒娇的羊完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
忧伤的南莲完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
xxt应助我爱科研采纳,获得20
17秒前
FashionBoy应助GEEK采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
555发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
安详的方盒完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
科研通AI6.1应助陈文娜采纳,获得10
22秒前
面包发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
玉小赤发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6032220
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7718536
关于积分的说明 16199366
捐赠科研通 5178872
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2771571
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1754850
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639894