Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
eden33完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科目三的应助被欢喜的羊青采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
上官若男的应助被自觉黄豆采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
sanshu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
nch完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
阿散完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
wanzi7完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
hx0107发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
超帅水杯发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
YY关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
grcanfly发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
BBKK完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Tom发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
orixero的应助被nch采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
我真的晕完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
汉堡包的应助被半圆采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
852的应助被幽默飞丹采纳,获得30
17秒前
栗筝发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
优雅女士完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
eden完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
今后的应助被liwh采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
研友_5Zl9D8发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
hu完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
今后的应助被王拥军采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
Cecilia发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Les Mots du discours 600
The Future of Digital Well-Being 600
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
Erzählte Gnade 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8100489
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9510786
关于积分的说明 21476723
捐赠科研通 7675961
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3408142
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2535943
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2447907