亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
桐桐应助假装无所谓采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
7秒前
蒙豆儿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
29秒前
鱼鱼发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Chloe79完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
47秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
47秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
48秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
48秒前
51秒前
科研通AI6应助herococa采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Dean发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
吃点水果保护局完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
水上汀州完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
ph完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
lgq12697应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
沈随便发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
Yesyes发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
NEO完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
deepast发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
初晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
科研通AI6应助丧彪采纳,获得150
3分钟前
3分钟前
希望天下0贩的0应助deepast采纳,获得10
3分钟前
flyinthesky完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
快乐听南发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
HC完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
张晓祁完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Yesyes完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Ava应助SDNUDRUG采纳,获得10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Fourth Edition 1000
Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
On the Validity of the Independent-Particle Model and the Sum-rule Approach to the Deeply Bound States in Nuclei 220
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4581808
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3999641
关于积分的说明 12381493
捐赠科研通 3674380
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2024917
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1058802
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 945566