Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
木木发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
李健的小迷弟应助秦春歌采纳,获得10
1秒前
4秒前
4秒前
丘比特应助富贵采纳,获得10
5秒前
huchen发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
积极的小馒头应助柳易槐采纳,获得10
7秒前
CodeCraft应助木木采纳,获得10
7秒前
研友_892kOL完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
klyang发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
蔡德富完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
lixiniverson完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
蔡问钰发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
wangayting发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
lll完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
积极的小馒头应助蔡问钰采纳,获得10
16秒前
冷酷的雅柔完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
无限凡白完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
怡然的绿蕊完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
Hello应助77采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
ding应助Crane采纳,获得10
19秒前
芮rich完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
龙傲天发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
22秒前
23秒前
面面完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
冷傲的鞋子完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
薰硝壤应助碧蓝小蜜蜂采纳,获得10
27秒前
moon发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
jinzhou完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
咕咕发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Raisin完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
lg完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3141210
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2792192
关于积分的说明 7801885
捐赠科研通 2448394
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1302521
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626638
版权声明 601237