Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
贪玩语蓉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
殿下小王子完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
安南完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
KOIKOI完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
stay发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yaya发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
pp发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Yuang发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
冷傲的果汁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
tkj666发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
5秒前
如意蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
陈明健发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
小周完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
风趣雪冥完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
海底完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
火顺丁完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
香蕉觅云应助Edddddy采纳,获得30
8秒前
悦悦发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
华仔应助pp采纳,获得10
8秒前
南北发布了新的文献求助50
8秒前
高高的箴完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
彬彬完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Akim应助ha哈采纳,获得10
10秒前
李健的小迷弟应助杭幻丝采纳,获得10
10秒前
闻紫彤发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
nianxunxi发布了新的文献求助200
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
满意代亦完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
zgnh完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
大角牛完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
pp完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Hydrothermal Circulation and Seawater Chemistry: Links and Feedbacks 1200
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
Risankizumab Versus Ustekinumab For Patients with Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: Results from the Phase 3B SEQUENCE Study 600
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5153744
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4349386
关于积分的说明 13541696
捐赠科研通 4192106
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2299286
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1299252
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1244272