Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
丁丁发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Virginkiller1984完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
勉乎哉发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
深情安青应助阔达雨文采纳,获得10
4秒前
浮游应助虾条采纳,获得10
5秒前
无私秋珊应助温婉的篮球采纳,获得10
5秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助HUYAOWEI采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
丘比特应助司马惜儿采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI5应助韶华若锦采纳,获得100
8秒前
江梦松发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
LG完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
CodeCraft应助chen采纳,获得10
11秒前
上官若男应助丁丁采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
张静完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
hhhhuo完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
嘟嘟嘟发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
完美世界应助刘大大采纳,获得10
15秒前
wwwyh发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
求学者完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
徐昊发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
司马惜儿完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
科研通AI5应助风清扬采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Artificial Intelligence driven Materials Design 600
Investigation the picking techniques for developing and improving the mechanical harvesting of citrus 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5191959
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4375052
关于积分的说明 13623481
捐赠科研通 4229203
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2319726
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1318311
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1268378