Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
刚刚
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
HOAN应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5728057
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5311160
关于积分的说明 15312957
捐赠科研通 4875318
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2618704
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1568361
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1525003