Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刻苦的延恶完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
思源应助lql采纳,获得10
2秒前
wendy_1006完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
哒哒哒完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
所所应助leeteukxx采纳,获得10
3秒前
Neaco发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
水母完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
娜娜完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
xzy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
jiabu完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
PSJ完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
pluto应助cuduoduo采纳,获得10
5秒前
aaatan完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
FreeRice发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
东方元语应助呼呼呼采纳,获得20
5秒前
高贵振家发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助勤奋紊采纳,获得10
7秒前
alexisgood发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
梅子发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
zhuhuayu关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
7秒前
杨小小完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
大个应助清秀镜子采纳,获得10
8秒前
情怀应助Michael_li采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Aokcers完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
MUAN完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
斯文麦片完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助apphare采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
平常水卉完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小龙完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
沉静的蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Yuan发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7258720
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8880691
关于积分的说明 18763633
捐赠科研通 6939181
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201408
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375349
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2177178