亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?

医学 预先护理计划 癌症 缓和医疗 萧条(经济学) 焦虑 性能状态 婚姻状况 随机化 社会经济地位 随机对照试验 肺癌 对话 内科学 物理疗法
作者
Michael G. Cohen,Andrew D. Althouse,Robert M. Arnold,Hailey W. Bulls,Douglas B. White,Edward Chu,Margaret Rosenzweig,Kenneth J. Smith,Yael Schenker
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34034
摘要

Clinicians often cite a fear of giving up hope as a reason they defer advance care planning (ACP) among patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether engagement in ACP affects hope in these patients.This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of primary palliative care in advanced cancer. Patients who had not completed ACP at baseline were included in the analysis. ACP was assessed in the forms of an end-of-life (EOL) conversation with one's oncologist and completion of a living will or advance directive (AD). Measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3 months. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI) (range, 12-48; higher scores indicate higher hope). Multivariate regression was performed to assess associations between ACP and hope, controlling for baseline HHI score, study randomization, patient age, religious importance, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since cancer diagnosis, pain/symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and anxiety/depression score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)-all variables known to be associated with ACP and/or hope.In total, 672 patients with advanced cancer were enrolled in the overall study. The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and the most common cancer types were lung cancer (36%), gastrointestinal cancer (20%) and breast/gynecologic cancers (16%). In this group, 378 patients (56%) had not had an EOL conversation at baseline, of whom 111 of 378 (29%) reported having an EOL conversation by 3 months. Hope was not different between patients who did or did not have an EOL conversation over the study period (mean ± standard deviation ∆HHI, 0.20 ± 5.32 vs -0.53 ± 3.80, respectively; P = .136). After multivariable adjustment, hope was significantly increased in patients who had engaged in an EOL conversation (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.08-1.82; P = .032). Similarly, of 216 patients (32%) without an AD at baseline, 67 (31%) had subsequently completed an AD. Unadjusted hope was not different between those who did and did not complete an AD (∆HHI, 0.20 ± 3.89 vs -0.91 ± 4.50, respectively; P = .085). After adjustment, hope was significantly higher in those who completed an AD (adjusted mean difference in ∆HHI, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.13-2.49; P = .030).The current results demonstrate that hope is not decreased after engagement in ACP and indeed may be increased. These findings may provide reassurance to clinicians who are apprehensive about having these important and difficult conversations.Many oncologists defer advance care planning (ACP) out of concern for giving up hope. This study demonstrates that hope is not decreased in patients who have engaged in ACP either as a conversation with their oncologists or by completing an advance directive. With this information, providers may feel more comfortable having these important conversations with their patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
wsnssbnhbx1发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
YuxinChen完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
比比拉布完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
十九岁发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
糜厉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
董羽佳完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
18秒前
张翊心发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
辛勤的冰珍完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
雾色笼晓树苍完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
清爽的从灵完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
852应助leilani采纳,获得10
44秒前
null应助Tina采纳,获得10
46秒前
温暖的忆霜完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
orixero应助周亚平采纳,获得10
1分钟前
OK给王汪汪的求助进行了留言
1分钟前
凶狠的翅膀完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
周亚平发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
罗Eason应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得30
1分钟前
完美世界应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得30
1分钟前
星辰大海应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得20
1分钟前
酷波er应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
在水一方应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
JamesPei应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
欣欣发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
molihuakai应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Owen应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
大模型应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Lucas应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
温柔的静丹完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
斯文败类应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Jasper应助爱听歌的悒采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7749790
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9297533
关于积分的说明 20240651
捐赠科研通 7331159
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460916
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2321673