头孢唑林
胎儿检查
克林霉素
医学
羊水
抗菌剂
胎儿
胎儿外科
羊水过多
怀孕
产科
麻醉
抗生素
外科
子宫内
生物
产前诊断
遗传学
微生物学
作者
Karel Allegaert,Anouk E. Muller,Francesca Maria Russo,Sam Schoenmakers,Jan Deprest,Birgit C. P. Koch
摘要
Abstract Antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery aims to prevent post‐operative site infections. For fetal surgery, this includes the fetal and amniotic compartments. Both are deep compartments as drug equilibrium with maternal blood is achieved relatively late. Despite prophylaxis, chorio‐amnionitis or endometritis following ex utero intrapartum treatment or fetoscopy occur in 4.13% and 1.45% respectively of the interventions. This review summarizes the observations on two commonly administered antimicrobials (cefazolin, clindamycin) for surgical prophylaxis during pregnancy, with emphasis on the deep compartments. For both compounds, antimicrobial exposure is on target when we consider the maternal and fetal plasma compartment. In contrast, amniotic fluid concentrations‐time profiles display a delayed and much more blunted pattern, behaving as deep compartment. For cefazolin, there are data that document further dilution in the setting of polyhydramnios. Along this deep compartment concept, there is some accumulation during repeated administration, modeled for cefazolin and observed for clindamycin. The relative underexposure to antimicrobials in amniotic fluid may be reflected in the pattern of maternal‐fetal complications after fetal surgery, and suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for fetal surgery should be reconsidered. Further studies should be designed by a multidisciplinary team (fetal surgeons, clinical pharmacologists and microbiologists) to facilitate efficient evaluation of antimicrobial prophylaxis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI