亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20%

医学 Latarjet程序 前肩 外科 运动范围 关节镜检查 Bankart修复 班卡病损 珊瑚 肩膀
作者
Luciano Rossi,Ignacio Tanoira,Tomás Gorodischer,Ignacio Pasqualini,Maximiliano Ranalletta
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:49 (4): 866-872 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1177/0363546520988154
摘要

Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%, both the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to sport at the same level they had before the injury. However, the Bankart procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence (20% vs 4%) and reoperation (16% vs 4%) than the Latarjet procedure.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冷傲新柔发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
BADFBOA完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
betyby完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
20秒前
上官若男应助distinct采纳,获得10
20秒前
ceeray23发布了新的文献求助20
26秒前
福明明完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
zjw完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
Qvby3完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
上官若男应助BADFBOA采纳,获得10
42秒前
45秒前
伊绵好完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
彩色德天发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
个性紫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
超威蓝猫发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
米线儿发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
lf发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
彩色德天完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
翻译度完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
细水长流发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
yingying完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
大方大船完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
谦让幻珊发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
温柔灵波完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
可爱的函函应助谦让幻珊采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ding应助江洋大盗采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Song完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
谦让幻珊完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
嗨好发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
2分钟前
沈惠映完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3976619
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520720
关于积分的说明 11204567
捐赠科研通 3257359
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798716
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877897
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806613