医学
安慰剂
补充氧气
交叉研究
最大VO2
计时审判
鼻插管
内科学
前瞻性队列研究
物理疗法
麻醉
心脏病学
心率
外科
血压
套管
病理
替代医学
作者
Shinichi Arizono,Taiki Furukawa,Hiroyuki Taniguchi,Koji Sakamoto,Tomoki Kimura,Kensuke Kataoka,Tomoya Ogawa,Fumiko Watanabe,Yasuhiro Kondoh
出处
期刊:Respirology
[Wiley]
日期:2020-05-05
卷期号:25 (11): 1152-1159
被引量:28
摘要
ABSTRACT Background and objective The efficacy of supplemental oxygen during exercise remains unclear for patients with IPF, as there have been conflicting results from recent prospective studies with small sample sizes. Methods This prospective, single‐blind, randomized, crossover trial evaluated the efficacy of supplemental oxygen compared with placebo air during exercise in consecutive patients with IPF without resting hypoxaemia at initial evaluation. Patients with <90% SpO 2 in a 6MWT using room air were randomly assigned to a CWRET at 80% of peak work rate with oxygen or placebo air gas via nasal cannula at 4 L/min. The primary endpoint was the effect of supplemental oxygen on endurance time. Results We recruited 72 consecutive patients (median age: 66.5 years, % FVC: 84.6%, % DL CO : 61.4%). Supplemental oxygen significantly increased the endurance time (340–424 s; P < 0.001) and minimum SpO 2 (88.0–94.0%; P < 0.001) compared with placebo air. Furthermore, supplemental oxygen significantly improved dyspnoea and leg fatigue. In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the endurance time on air was an independent explanatory variable of the improvement rate of endurance time ( P = 0.02). Conclusion In mild–moderate IPF with exercise‐induced hypoxaemia even without resting hypoxaemia, supplemental oxygen during exercise improved the endurance time, desaturation and subjective symptoms. Patients with shorter endurance times with placebo air showed better improvement with supplemental oxygen.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI