Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence and short‐term photosynthetic response to drought

Abstract Drought is among the most damaging climate extremes, potentially causing significant decline in ecosystem functioning and services at the regional to global scale, thus monitoring of drought events is critically important. Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been found to strongly correlate with gross primary production on the global scale. Recent advances in the remote sensing of SIF allow for large‐scale, real‐time estimation of photosynthesis using this relationship. However, several studies have used SIF to quantify the impact of drought with mixed results, and the leaf‐level mechanisms linking SIF and photosynthesis are unclear, particularly how the relationship may change under drought. We conducted a drought experiment with 2‐yr old Populus deltoides . We measured leaf‐level gas exchange, SIF, and pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence before and during the 1‐month drought. We found clear responses of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to water stress, however, SIF showed a smaller response to drought. Net photosynthesis ( A net ) and conductance dropped 94% and 95% on average over the drought, while SIF values only decreased slightly (21%). Electron transport rate dropped 64% when compared to the control over the last week of drought, but the electron transport chain did not completely shut down as A net approached zero. Additionally, SIF yield (SIF y ) was positively correlated with steady‐state fluorescence ( F s ) and negatively correlated with non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ; R 2 = 0.77). Both F s and SIF y , after normalization by the minimum fluorescence from a dark‐adapted sample ( F o ), showed a more pronounced drought response, although the results suggest the response is complicated by several factors. Leaf‐level experiments can elucidate mechanisms behind large‐scale remote sensing observations of ecosystem functioning. The value of SIF as an accurate estimator of photosynthesis may decrease during mild stress events of short duration, especially when the response is primarily stomatal and not fully coupled with the light reactions of photosynthesis. We discuss potential factors affecting the weak SIF response to drought, including upregulation of NPQ, change in internal leaf structure and chlorophyll concentration, and photorespiration. The results suggest that SIF is mainly controlled by the light reactions of photosynthesis, which operate on different timescales than the stomatal response.