作者
Zhanli Ma,Yan Zhu,Jian Liu,Y.C. Li,Jinzhu Zhang,Yue Wen,Libing Song,Yonghui Liang,Zhenhua Wang
摘要
Brackish water stands as a promising alternative to mitigate freshwater scarcity in arid regions. However, its application poses potential threats to agricultural sustainability. There is a need to establish a clear understanding of the economic and ecological benefits. We conducted a two-year (2021−2022) field experiment to investigate the effects of four different irrigation water salinity levels on soil electrical conductivity, cotton yield, water use efficiency, CO2 emissions, and carbon sequestration. The salinity levels were designated as CK (0.85 g L−1), S1 (3 g L−1), S2 (5 g L−1), and S3 (8 g L−1). Results indicated that using irrigation water with high salinity (≥5 g L−1) led to the accumulation of salt in the soil, and a decrease in plant biomass and seed cotton yield. Compared to CK, the S3 treatment decreased by 18.72 % and 20.10 % in the respective two years. Interestingly, using brackish water (3 L−1 and 5 g L−1) decreased the rate and cumulative CO2 emissions, and increased the carbon emission efficiency and carbon sequestration by 0.098–0.094 kg kg−1 and 871–1859 kg ha−1 in 2021, 0.098–0.094 kg kg−1 and 617–1995 kg ha−1 in 2022, respectively. To comprehensively evaluate the tradeoff between economic and ecological benefits, we employed the TOPSIS method, and S1 was identified as the optimal irrigation salinity. Through fitting analysis, the most suitable irrigation salinity levels for 2021 and 2022 were determined as 3.52 g L−1 and 3.31 g L−1, respectively. From the perspective of water conservation, salinity management, yield improvement, and reduction of CO2 emissions, it is feasible to utilize brackish water for irrigation purposes, as long as the salinity does not exceed 3.52 g L−1 (first year) and 3.31 g L−1 (second year).