医学教育
背景(考古学)
课程
同行反馈
意志(语言学)
心理学
考试(生物学)
定性研究
代理(哲学)
医学
教育学
社会学
古生物学
哲学
认识论
生物
语言学
社会科学
作者
Elise V. van Wijk,Floris M. van Blankenstein,Roemer J. Janse,Eline A. Dubois,Alexandra M. J. Langers
摘要
Abstract Background Active engagement with feedback is crucial for feedback to be effective and improve students' learning and achievement. Medical students are provided feedback on their development in the progress test (PT), which has been implemented in various medical curricula, although its format, integration and feedback differ across institutions. Existing research on engagement with feedback in the context of PT is not sufficient to make a definitive judgement on what works and which barriers exist. Therefore, we conducted an interview study to explore students' feedback use in medical progress testing. Methods All Dutch medical students participate in a national, curriculum‐independent PT four times a year. This mandatory test, composed of multiple‐choice questions, provides students with written feedback on their scores. Furthermore, an answer key is available to review their answers. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 21 preclinical and clinical medical students who participated in the PT. Template analysis was performed on the qualitative data using a priori themes based on previous research on feedback use. Results Template analysis revealed that students faced challenges in crucial internal psychological processes that impact feedback use, including ‘awareness’, ‘cognizance’, ‘agency’ and ‘volition’. Factors such as stakes, available time, feedback timing and feedback presentation contributed to these difficulties, ultimately hindering feedback use. Notably, feedback engagement was higher during clinical rotations, and students were interested in the feedback when seeking insights into their performance level and career perspectives. Conclusion Our study enhanced the understanding of students' feedback utilisation in medical progress testing by identifying key processes and factors that impact feedback use. By recognising and addressing barriers in feedback use, we can improve both student and teacher feedback literacy, thereby transforming the PT into a more valuable learning tool.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI