医学
磁共振成像
烧蚀
心脏病学
导管消融
导管
随机对照试验
放射科
内科学
外科
作者
Gregory M. Marcus,Roderick Tung,Edward P. Gerstenfeld,Trisha F. Hue,Feng Lin,Jing Cheng,J. Peter Weiss,Wendy S. Tzou,Henry H. Hsia,Ashkan Ehdaie,Daniel H. Cooper,T. Jared Bunch,Jeffrey Arkles,Babak Nazer,Adam Lee,Alexios Hadjis,Duy T. Nguyen,Mihail G. Chelu,Joshua D. Moss,Jonathan C. Hsu
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2025-02-24
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.124.071352
摘要
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, one of the most rapidly growing procedures in cardiac electrophysiology, is associated with magnetic resonance imaging–detected brain lesions in more than half of cases. Although a retrograde aortic approach is conventional, modern tools enable entry through a transseptal approach that may avoid embolization of debris from the arterial system. We sought to test the hypothesis that a transseptal puncture would mitigate brain injury compared with a retrograde aortic approach. METHODS: The TRAVERSE trial (Transseptal Versus Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli) was a multicenter randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Patients with left ventricular arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation procedures were randomly assigned to a transseptal puncture approach compared (1:1) with a retrograde aortic approach. The primary outcome was the presence of an acute brain lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included clinically manifest complications, procedural efficacy, and 6-month neurocognitive assessments. RESULTS: Among the 62 patients randomly assigned to a retrograde aortic approach with postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging, 28 (45%) exhibited an acute brain lesion compared with 19 of the 69 (28%) of those randomized to a transseptal puncture ( P =0.036). No differences in clinically manifest complications or procedural efficacy were observed. More patients in the retrograde aortic arm were categorized as having a high likelihood of cognitive impairment at 6 months (33% compared with 19% of those in the transseptal arm), but substantial loss to follow-up was present. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing left ventricular catheter ablation procedures, a transseptal approach reduced the risk of acute brain lesions by nearly half compared with a retrograde aortic approach without sacrificing safety or efficacy. Given a likely embolic pathogenesis, the brain magnetic resonance imaging findings may reflect a propensity to other organ damage; these findings may extend to other procedures requiring left ventricular entry. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03946072
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI