医学
无容量
易普利姆玛
肾细胞癌
内科学
肿瘤科
免疫疗法
无进展生存期
肾透明细胞癌
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂
癌症
总体生存率
作者
Kelly N Fitzgerald,Cihan Duzgol,Andrea Knezevic,Natalie Shapnik,Ritesh Kotecha,David H. Aggen,Maria I. Carlo,Neil J. Shah,Martin H. Voss,Darren R. Feldman,Robert J. Motzer,Chung-Han Lee
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.017
摘要
In patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma starting first-line treatment, there is no significant difference in progression-free survival after second line of therapy between patients who received ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus those who received combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitor with immunotherapy. Immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations used to treat metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) include dual immune checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab and nivolumab (IO/IO) and several combinations of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (TKI/IO). IO/IO and TKI/IO approaches have not been compared directly, and it is unknown whether patients who do not respond to first-line IO/IO can salvage long-term survival by receiving a second-line TKI. Progression-free survival after second-line therapy (PFS-2) evaluates the ability to be salvaged by second-line therapy. We retrospectively evaluated 173 patients treated with first-line IO/IO or TKI/IO for metastatic ccRCC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and report PFS-2, overall survival, and response to second line of therapy (ORR 2nd ) for groups defined by first-line category. Although ORR 2nd was significantly higher with IO/IO than with TKI/IO (47% vs 13%, p < 0.001), there was no significant difference in median PFS-2 for TKI/IO versus IO/IO (44 vs 23 mo, log-rank p = 0.1) or restricted mean survival time (RMST) for PFS-2 when adjusted for propensity score (33 vs 30 mo; difference 2.6 mo [95% confidence interval {CI}: –2.6, 7.9]; p = 0.3). There was also no significant difference in RMST for overall survival when adjusted for propensity score (38 vs 37 mo; group difference 1.0 mo [95% CI: –3.4, 5.5]; p = 0.7). These findings do not support a change in current utilization practices for IO/IO and TKI/IO treatment strategies for ccRCC. In cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma, no significant difference was observed in progression-free survival after second line of therapy between patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab and those receiving a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI