医学
桡动脉
闭塞
动脉瘤
心脏病学
外科
动脉
放射科
内科学
作者
Michiyasu Fuga,Toshihide Tanaka,Rintaro Tachi,Kyoichi Tomoto,Kenta Kazami,Akihiko Teshigawara,Toshihiro Ishibashi,Yuzuru Hasegawa,Yuichi Murayama
标识
DOI:10.1177/15910199231189927
摘要
Purpose Neurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA. Methods Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO. Results Seventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; p = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10 −3 , 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10 −5 –0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1–105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66–0.95]). Conclusion Radial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI