How to use bipolar and unipolar electrograms for selecting successful ablation sites of ventricular premature contractions

烧蚀 QRS波群 医学 心脏病学 内科学 心电图
作者
Koji Higuchi,Hagai Yavin,Jakub Sroubek,Arwa Younis,Israel Zilberman,Elad Anter
出处
期刊:Heart Rhythm [Elsevier]
卷期号:19 (7): 1067-1073 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.035
摘要

Background Local activation time is often determined by the maximal negative of the extracellular unipolar potential (−dV/dTmax). While this is accurate in 2-dimensional uniform tissue, propagation through nonuniform or 3-dimensional structures have shown discordance between −dV/dTmax and local activation time. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between bipolar and unipolar electrograms for selecting successful ablation sites of endocardial (superficial) vs intramural (deep) ventricular premature contractions (VPCs). Methods This cohort consisted of 66 patients with VPCs presenting for ablation in a bigeminy, trigeminy, or quadrigeminy pattern. VPCs were classified as endocardial if ablation at the earliest endocardial site resulted in immediate suppression (<10 seconds) or as intramural if ablation resulted in delayed suppression (≥10 seconds), required multiple applications, or was not achieved. Unipolar and bipolar electrograms were analyzed. Results In endocardial VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection corresponded with unipolar −dV/dTmax, occurring 20.5 ms (17.8–26.0 ms) and 16.0 ms (6.8–22.0 ms), respectively, before the QRS onset. In successfully ablated intramural VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection preceded the QRS onset by 14.0 ms (11.2–22.6 ms) and coincided with the first rapid unipolar deflection, although −dV/dTmax occurred 10.5 ms (0.0–20.8 ms) after the QRS onset and often coincided with far-field activity. In unsuccessfully ablated intramural VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection to QRS onset interval was shorter in comparison to successfully ablated intramural VPCs (1.5 ms vs 14.0 ms; P < .001) while the unipolar −dV/dTmax to QRS onset interval was similar (P = .095). Conclusion Mapping of VPCs should be guided by the first rapid bipolar deflection that corresponds to a similarly early unipolar deflection but not with −dV/dTmax. Local activation time is often determined by the maximal negative of the extracellular unipolar potential (−dV/dTmax). While this is accurate in 2-dimensional uniform tissue, propagation through nonuniform or 3-dimensional structures have shown discordance between −dV/dTmax and local activation time. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between bipolar and unipolar electrograms for selecting successful ablation sites of endocardial (superficial) vs intramural (deep) ventricular premature contractions (VPCs). This cohort consisted of 66 patients with VPCs presenting for ablation in a bigeminy, trigeminy, or quadrigeminy pattern. VPCs were classified as endocardial if ablation at the earliest endocardial site resulted in immediate suppression (<10 seconds) or as intramural if ablation resulted in delayed suppression (≥10 seconds), required multiple applications, or was not achieved. Unipolar and bipolar electrograms were analyzed. In endocardial VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection corresponded with unipolar −dV/dTmax, occurring 20.5 ms (17.8–26.0 ms) and 16.0 ms (6.8–22.0 ms), respectively, before the QRS onset. In successfully ablated intramural VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection preceded the QRS onset by 14.0 ms (11.2–22.6 ms) and coincided with the first rapid unipolar deflection, although −dV/dTmax occurred 10.5 ms (0.0–20.8 ms) after the QRS onset and often coincided with far-field activity. In unsuccessfully ablated intramural VPCs, the first rapid bipolar deflection to QRS onset interval was shorter in comparison to successfully ablated intramural VPCs (1.5 ms vs 14.0 ms; P < .001) while the unipolar −dV/dTmax to QRS onset interval was similar (P = .095). Mapping of VPCs should be guided by the first rapid bipolar deflection that corresponds to a similarly early unipolar deflection but not with −dV/dTmax.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
小二郎应助CDI和LIB采纳,获得10
1秒前
kiki完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
八号向日葵完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
闪闪山水完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
sss发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
高高的梦曼完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
cdqiu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
我的miemie发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
xiaobai发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
甜甜玫瑰应助安静笑晴采纳,获得10
15秒前
传奇3应助安静笑晴采纳,获得10
15秒前
春樹暮雲完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
薰硝壤应助平淡的紫青采纳,获得10
17秒前
研友_Ze0vBn发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Owen应助MrFamous采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
Anonymity完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
元谷雪应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
19秒前
元谷雪应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
19秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
不配.应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
19秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
元谷雪应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
李华发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Anonymity发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3145115
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2796489
关于积分的说明 7819996
捐赠科研通 2452771
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1305202
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627448
版权声明 601449