Evaluating the use of machine learning in endometrial cancer: a systematic review

机器学习 医学 人工智能 子宫内膜癌 逻辑回归 支持向量机 癌症 算法 计算机科学 内科学
作者
Sabrina Piedimonte,Gabriella Rosa,Brigitte Gerstl,Mars Sopocado,Ana Coronel,Salvador Lleno,Danielle Vicus
出处
期刊:International Journal of Gynecological Cancer [BMJ]
卷期号:33 (9): 1383-1393 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2023-004622
摘要

Objective To review the literature on machine learning in endometrial cancer, report the most commonly used algorithms, and compare performance with traditional prediction models. Methods This is a systematic review of the literature from January 1985 to March 2021 on the use of machine learning in endometrial cancer. An extensive search of electronic databases was conducted. Four independent reviewers screened studies initially by title then full text. Quality was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. P values were derived using the Pearson’s Χ 2 test in JMP 15.0. Results Among 4295 articles screened, 30 studies on machine learning in endometrial cancer were included. The most frequent applications were in patient datasets (33.3%, n=10), pre-operative diagnostics (30%, n=9), genomics (23.3%, n=7), and serum biomarkers (13.3%, n=4). The most commonly used models were neural networks (n=10, 33.3%) and support vector machine (n=6, 20%). The number of publications on machine learning in endometrial cancer increased from 1 in 2010 to 29 in 2021.Eight studies compared machine learning with traditional statistics. Among patient dataset studies, two machine learning models (20%) performed similarly to logistic regression (accuracy: 0.85 vs 0.82, p=0.16). Machine learning algorithms performed similarly to detect endometrial cancer based on MRI (accuracy: 0.87 vs 0.82, p=0.24) while outperforming traditional methods in predicting extra-uterine disease in one serum biomarker study (accuracy: 0.81 vs 0.61). For survival outcomes, one study compared machine learning with Kaplan-Meier and reported no difference in concordance index (83.8% vs 83.1%). Conclusion Although machine learning is an innovative and emerging technology, performance is similar to that of traditional regression models in endometrial cancer. More studies are needed to assess its role in endometrial cancer. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021269565.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JamesPei应助xmf采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
文静水池完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
自觉香烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
NexusExplorer应助YH_Z采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
豆芽发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
该饮茶了完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
风清扬发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
王鑫毅发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
newnew完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
CipherSage应助微笑的冰枫采纳,获得10
7秒前
善学以致用应助小宇采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
星期日发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
Yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
baoziya完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
苹果怀曼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
equinox发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
isasi完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
Mary完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
wanci应助阳光的盼烟采纳,获得10
13秒前
cg发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
37666发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Sano完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6017981
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7604491
关于积分的说明 16157898
捐赠科研通 5165641
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764960
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746441
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635250