生物等效性
置信区间
医学
药代动力学
几何平均数
曲线下面积
曲线下面积
统计
数学
药理学
内科学
作者
Zenglian Yue,Yin Wang,Li Zeng,Tao Jin,Yucheng Sheng
摘要
Abstract This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of 2 avapritinib tablets formulations. A randomized, open‐label, single‐center trial was conducted on fasting, healthy Chinese participants. The study utilized a partial replicated design with 3 sequences and 3 periods. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 sequences, with each sequence receiving the reference formulation twice and the test formulation once. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The bioequivalence of the 2 avapritinib formulations was assessed using reference‐scaled average bioequivalence for the maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and the average bioequivalence analysis for the area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC). Out of 39 participants, 38 completed the study. For C max , the 1‐sided 95% upper confidence interval (CI) bound from the scaled approach was −0.035 (<0) and the point estimate value was 0.958, falling inside the acceptance range of 0.8‐1.25. For both the AUC over all concentrations measured (AUC 0‐t ) and the AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC 0‐inf ), the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios (0.87‐1.01) also met the bioequivalence criteria of 0.8‐1.25. Consequently, the study demonstrated that the 2 avapritinib formulations were bioequivalent under fasting conditions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI