医学
内科学
中性粒细胞减少症
置信区间
曲线下面积
危险系数
胃肠病学
药代动力学
髓系白血病
人口
阿扎胞苷
造血干细胞移植
肿瘤科
移植
化疗
生物化学
基因表达
化学
环境卫生
DNA甲基化
基因
作者
Allison Gaudy,Eric Laille,Rochelle Bailey,Simon Zhou,Barry Skikne,C.L. Beach
摘要
Oral azacitidine (oral‐AZA) maintenance is approved for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission post‐intensive chemotherapy, not proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterize oral‐AZA concentration–time profiles in patients with AML, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. PopPK‐estimated exposure parameters were used to evaluate exposure–response relationships in the phase III QUAZAR AML‐001 study. The PopPK dataset comprised 286 patients with 1,933 evaluable oral‐AZA concentration records. The final PopPK model was a one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption incorporating an absorption lag time and first‐order elimination. Regression analyses identified two oral‐AZA exposure parameters (area under the plasma concentration–time curve at steady state (AUC ss ); maximum plasma concentration ( C max )) as statistically significant predictors for relapse‐free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.521, P < 0.001; HR = 0.630, P = 0.013; respectively), and AUC ss as a significant predictor for overall survival (HR = 0.673, P = 0.042). The probability of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly increased with increases in AUC ss (odds ratio (OR) = 5.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.73–12.62, P < 0.001), cumulative AUC through cycles 1 to 6 (OR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.76–4.44, P < 0.001), and C max at steady‐state (OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.23–4.76, P = 0.012). A decreasing trend was identified between AUC ss and relapse‐related schedule extensions, vs. an increasing trend between AUC ss and event‐related dose reductions. As the majority (56.8%) of patients required no dose modifications, and the proportions requiring schedule extension (19.4%) or dose reduction (22.9%) were almost equal, oral‐AZA 300 mg once daily for 14 days is the optimal dosing schedule balancing survival benefit and safety risk.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI