Is manipulation of mediastinal chest drains useful or harmful after cardiac surgery?

医学 挤奶 外科 心脏外科 心胸外科 排水 灌注 心脏病学 生态学 考古 生物 历史
作者
Thomas G. Day,Roslyn R. Perring,Katy Gofton
出处
期刊:Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:7 (5): 878-890 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1510/icvts.2008.185413
摘要

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients who have undergone cardiothoracic surgery does manipulation of drainage tubes affect drainage volumes or post-surgical outcome? Altogether 681 papers were found using the reported search, of which four represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Duncan and Erickson in 1982 found that chest tube stripping can lead to very low negative intrathoracic pressures. The authors report that this has the potential to cause tissue injury. Issacson et al. in 1986 compared two different methods of drain manipulation. They found no significant differences in the milking and stripping methods, suggesting that they are of similar efficacy in enhancing drainage. Lim-Levy et al. in 1986 also compared milking vs. stripping, with a control group that received no manipulation. They found no significant differences between the three groups in drainage volume. Furthermore, they recorded no incidences of tube occlusion in any of the three groups, implying that leaving the drains free of manipulation is acceptable in terms of clot clearance in the majority of patients. The milking and stripping methods were also compared by Pierce et al. in 1991. They also found no significant differences between the two manipulation methods. The studies by Issacson et al., Lim-Levy et al., and Pierce et al. were included in a Cochrane systematic review by Wallen et al. in 2002. No other relevant studies other than the three mentioned above were found after an extensive search of the literature. Overall, the authors concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend one type of drain manipulation technique over another, or to support or refute the need for drain manipulation at all. In our paper the authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that due to possible tissue damage and lack of demonstrable benefit, in most patients drainage tube manipulation should not be performed. No differences in either safety or efficacy have been demonstrated between the milking and stripping methods of manipulation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
yuanbao完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ATOM完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
shibbit完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
酷酷珠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
陈伟杰发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
mzzzz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
MOD发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
所所应助蔡蔡采纳,获得10
9秒前
崔尔蓉发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
LiDaYang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
fzhou完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
14秒前
MOD完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
彩色的唇膏完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
Koi完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
JamesPei应助失眠的海云采纳,获得10
23秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助爱听歌土豆采纳,获得10
28秒前
火星上的从雪完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
Ava应助笨笨的傲晴采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
彭凯发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
田様应助明理十三采纳,获得10
37秒前
38秒前
七月不看海完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
41秒前
YRY完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
Owen应助彭凯采纳,获得10
43秒前
大个应助飞飞飞采纳,获得10
45秒前
高分求助中
进口的时尚——14世纪东方丝绸与意大利艺术 Imported Fashion:Oriental Silks and Italian Arts in the 14th Century 800
Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise: linear versus a velocity-based flexible model 550
临床微生物检验问与答 (第二版), 人民卫生出版社, 2014:146 500
Green building development for a sustainable environment with artificial intelligence technology 500
Zeitschrift für Orient-Archäologie 500
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution 320
Med Surg Certification Review Book: 3 Practice Tests and CMSRN Study Guide for the Medical Surgical (RN-BC) Exam [5th Edition] 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3351004
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2976541
关于积分的说明 8675492
捐赠科研通 2657683
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1455204
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 673751
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 664242