操作化
全球定位系统
心理学
物质使用
社会环境
背景(考古学)
语境设计
社会心理的
应用心理学
环境卫生
地理
临床心理学
医学
计算机科学
精神科
哲学
人工智能
考古
法学
认识论
电信
对象(语法)
政治学
作者
Mei‐Po Kwan,Jue Wang,Matthew Tyburski,David H. Epstein,William J. Kowalczyk,Kenzie L. Preston
标识
DOI:10.1080/13658816.2018.1503276
摘要
This study examined how contextual areas defined and operationalized differently may lead to different exposure estimates. Substance users’ exposures to environmental stress (in terms of two variables: community social economic status and crime) were assessed from global positioning systems (GPS) data. Participants were 47 outpatients with substance use disorders admitted for methadone maintenance at a research clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. From 35.2 million GPS tracking points, we compared 7 different methods for defining activity space. The different methods yielded different exposure estimates, which would lead to different conclusions in studies using only one method. These results have important implications for future research on the effect of contextual influences on health behaviors and outcomes: whether a study observes any significant influence of an environmental factor on health may depend on what contextual units are used to assess individual exposure.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI