达拉图穆马
医学
内科学
地塞米松
危险系数
硼替佐米
多发性骨髓瘤
临床终点
耐火材料(行星科学)
胃肠病学
无进展生存期
置信区间
肿瘤科
随机对照试验
化疗
生物
天体生物学
作者
Weijun Fu,Wei Li,Jianda Hu,Gang An,Yafei Wang,Chengcheng Fu,Lijuan Chen,Jie Jin,Xiaowei Cen,Zheng Ge,Zhen Cai,Ting Niu,Ming Qi,Xue Gai,Qian Li,Weiping Liu,Wenyu Liu,Xue Yang,Xi Chen,Jin Lu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2022.10.007
摘要
In the phase 3 LEPUS study, daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit versus Vd alone in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from LEPUS.Chinese patients with ≥ 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 2:1 to bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for eight cycles ± daratumumab (16 mg/kg) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).In total, 211 patients were randomized to D-Vd (n = 141) or Vd (n = 70). At a 25.1-month median follow-up, D-Vd prolonged PFS versus Vd (median, 14.8 vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.51; P < .00001). PFS benefit of D-Vd versus Vd was maintained across prespecified subgroups, including patients with prior bortezomib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.53), patients who were refractory to last prior line of therapy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), and patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71). Overall response rate (84.7% vs.66.7%; P = .00314) and rates of very good partial response or better (71.5% vs. 34.9%; P < .00001) and complete response or better (40.1% vs 14.3%; P = .00016) were higher with D-Vd versus Vd. No new safety concerns were identified.In this updated analysis, D-Vd maintained significant efficacy benefits versus Vd alone and demonstrated a consistent safety profile, further supporting the use of D-Vd as a standard of care in Chinese patients with RRMM.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI