已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Physical activity and exercise for cancer-related cognitive impairment among individuals affected by childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 心理信息 奇纳 荟萃分析 梅德林 科克伦图书馆 随机对照试验 物理疗法 心理干预 认知 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Joshua D. K. Bernal,Francesco Recchia,Danny J. Yu,Dyt Fong,Stephen Heung‐Sang Wong,Pak‐Kwong Chung,Derwin King Chung Chan,Catherine M. Capio,Clare Chung-Wah Yu,Sam W.S. Wong,Cindy H. P. Sit,Yajun Chen,W. R. Thompson,Parco M. Siu
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:7 (1): 47-58 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00286-3
摘要

Individuals affected by childhood cancer can have cognitive dysfunction that persists into adulthood and negatively affects quality of life. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognitive function among individuals affected by childhood cancer.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched seven databases (CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) and two clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) published (or registered) from database inception to Jan 30, 2022, with no language restrictions. We included studies that compared the effects of physical activity or exercise interventions with controls (no intervention or usual care) on cognitive function among individuals diagnosed with any type of cancer at age 0-19 years. Two reviewers (JDKB and FR) independently screened records for eligibility and searched references of the selected studies; extracted study-level data from published reports; and assessed study risk of bias of RCTs and NRSIs using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools, certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, and any adverse events. We used intention-to-treat data and unpublished data if available. Cognitive function was assessed by standardised cognitive performance measures (primary outcome) and by validated patient-reported measures (secondary outcome). A random-effects meta-analysis model using the inverse-variance and Hartung-Knapp methods was used to calculate pooled estimates (Hedges' g) and 95% CI values. We estimated the heterogeneity variance by the restricted maximum likelihood method and calculated I2 values to measure heterogeneity. We examined funnel plots and used Egger's regression test to assess for publication bias. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021261061.We screened 12 425 titles and abstracts, which resulted in full-text assessment of 131 potentially relevant reports. We evaluated 22 unique studies (16 RCTs and six NRSIs) with data on 1277 individuals affected by childhood cancer and low-to-moderate risk of bias. Of the 1277 individuals, 674 [52·8%] were male and 603 [47·2%] were female; median age at study start was 12 (IQR 11-14) years, median time since the end of cancer treatment was 2·5 (IQR -1·1 to 3·0) years, and median intervention period was 12 [IQR 10-24] weeks. There was moderate-quality evidence that, compared with control, physical activity and exercise improved cognitive performance measures (five RCTs; Hedges' g 0·40 [95% CI 0·07-0·73], p=0·027; I2=18%) and patient-reported measures of cognitive function (13 RCTs; Hedges' g 0·26 [0·09-0·43], p=0·0070; I2=40%). No evidence of publication bias was found. Nine mild adverse events were reported.There is moderate-certainty evidence that physical activity and exercise improves cognitive function among individuals affected by childhood cancer, which supports the use of physical activity for managing cancer-related cognitive impairment.Research Impact Fund of Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee (R7024-20) and Seed Fund for Basic Research of the University of Hong Kong.© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小二郎应助ShiRz采纳,获得10
1秒前
Niu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
谨慎萤完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
李爱国应助Artifica采纳,获得10
4秒前
高高一刀发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
9秒前
秋鱼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
wangzhihui发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
谨慎萤发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
gexiaoyang发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
柚子肉发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
Jay发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
香蕉觅云应助谨慎萤采纳,获得10
20秒前
wangzhihui完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
云风发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
orixero应助小白采纳,获得10
28秒前
FYhan完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
科研顺利完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
赘婿应助包容溪灵采纳,获得10
32秒前
传奇3应助李...采纳,获得10
32秒前
bkagyin应助云风采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
可爱的函函应助ausue采纳,获得10
35秒前
41秒前
43秒前
44秒前
44秒前
海贼学术完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
47秒前
47秒前
科研通AI5应助帅气寒香采纳,获得100
48秒前
SciGPT应助Haydeehu采纳,获得10
48秒前
红黄蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
王博士发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
J'AI COMBATTU POUR MAO // ANNA WANG 660
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Introduction to Comparative Public Administration Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Third Edition 3rd edition 500
Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial 400
THE STRUCTURES OF 'SHR' AND 'YOU' IN MANDARIN CHINESE 330
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3753544
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3297104
关于积分的说明 10097476
捐赠科研通 3011817
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1654266
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 788720
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 752966