耐受性
吗氯贝胺
非典型忧郁症
抗抑郁药
苯乙嗪
安慰剂
单胺氧化酶抑制剂
曲安奈普罗明
精神科
心理学
医学
随机对照试验
内科学
心情
单胺氧化酶
不利影响
焦虑
替代医学
生物化学
化学
病理
酶
作者
Anna Giménez‐Palomo,Anjli K. Chamdal,Natalie Gottlieb,Mojtaba Lotfaliany,Tahir Jokinen,Eslam M. Bastawy,Katherine Adlington,Nawal Benachar,Seetal Dodd,Isabella Pacchiarotti,Eduard Vieta,Michael Berk,Paul Stokes
摘要
Abstract Background Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are considered third‐line treatments for treatment resistant depression; however, they are underused in clinical practice. Aims This study aimed to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of MAOIs for the treatment of depression in comparison with other antidepressant treatments. Methods A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomised clinical trials was performed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability between MAOIs and other antidepressant treatments for the treatment of depressive episodes. Results A total of 83 double‐blinded, randomised controlled trials were included in the analysis, with 7765 participants assigned to an active treatment and 1844 assigned to placebo. Several MAOIs, including isocarboxazid, phenelzine, tranylcypromine and moclobemide, showed significantly higher efficacy compared with placebo. The tolerability and acceptability of MAOIs was comparable to other antidepressants. Limitations A disproportionate number of studies investigating the most commonly used MAOIs, such as moclobemide and phenelzine, and a lack of specific studies focusing on treatment‐resistant and atypical depression. Conclusions MAOIs are similar in efficacy to other antidepressants for the treatment of depression. However, more studies are needed comparing MAOI treatment in people with treatment‐resistant, atypical and bipolar depression.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI