护根物
农学
稻草
环境科学
土壤水分
旱地农业
蓄水
生长季节
用水效率
灌溉
农业
生物
土壤科学
生态学
机械工程
入口
工程类
作者
Hubing Zhao,Guanfei Liu,Yingxia Dou,Huimin Yang,Tao Wang,Li Wang,S. S. Malhi,Adnan Khan
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jia.2024.01.008
摘要
Amplifying drought stress and high precipitation variability impair dryland wheat production. These problems can potentially be minimized by using plastic mulch (PM) or straw mulch (SM). Therefore, wheat grain yield, soil water storage, soil temperature and water-use productivity (WUP) of PM and SM treatments were compared with no mulch (CK) treatment on dryland wheat over a period of eight seasons. Compared to the CK treatment, PM and SM treatments on average significantly increased grain yield by 12.6 and 10.5%, respectively. Compared to the CK treatment, SM treatment significantly decreased soil daily temperature by 0.57, 0.60 and 0.48°C for the whole seasons, growing periods and summer fallow periods, respectively. In contrast, compared to the CK treatment, PM treatment increased soil daily temperature by 0.44, 0.51 and 0.27°C for the whole seasons, growing periods and summer fallow periods, respectively. Lower soil temperature under SM allowed greater soil water storage than under PM. Pre-seeding soil water storage was 17% greater under the SM than under the PM treatment. Soil water storage post-harvest was similar for the PM and SM treatments, but evapotranspiration (ET) was 4.5% higher in the SM than in the PM treatment. Consequently, WUP was 6.6% greater under PM than under the SM treatment. Therefore, PM treatment increased dryland wheat yield and water-use productivity, while straw mulch increased soil water storage.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI