亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Vancomycin Hypersensitivity: It Is Not Always What It Seems

万古霉素 医学 抗菌剂 免疫学 微生物学 过敏 过敏反应 免疫球蛋白E 金黄色葡萄球菌 生物 细菌 抗体 遗传学
作者
Oyindamola Stephanie Kayode,Krzysztof Rutkowski
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (2): 913-915 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.040
摘要

Vancomycin was first isolated in 1957 from the bacteria Amycolatopsis orientalis from the jungles of Borneo. Its name is derived from the word “vanquish.” It is a bactericidal tricyclic glycopeptide active against gram-positive aerobic cocci and bacilli through inhibition of cell wall synthesis. In addition to being first-line therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus infections, it is used as second-line antimicrobial therapy in patients labeled allergic to beta-lactam antimicrobials. Vancomycin is also active against gram-positive anaerobes including Clostridium difficile. With vancomycin resistance limited to only a handful of strains, it is one of the most used antimicrobials in the United States. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to vancomycin were reported as early as 1962. Most immediate HSRs do not appear to be IgE-mediated. Only 10% of HSR case reports suggest a possible IgE-mediated mechanism based on a convincing clinical presentation, positive skin testing (ST) result, and breakthrough symptoms despite premedication or during desensitization.1Minhas J.S. Wickner P.G. Long A.A. Banerji A. Blumenthal K.G. Immune-mediated reactions to vancomycin: a systematic case review and analysis.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016; 116: 544-553Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar This may be an overestimation because (severe) red man syndrome (RMS) can be clinically difficult to distinguish from IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. IgE-independent mast cell and basophil degranulation, causing RMS, occurs in up to 47% of patients treated with vancomycin.2Wallace M.R. Mascola J.R. Oldfield E.C. Red man syndrome: incidence, etiology and prophylaxis.J Infect Dis. 1991; 164: 1180-1185Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar RMS is mediated through the MAS-related G-protein–coupled receptor X2 and does not require prior sensitizing vancomycin exposure.3Azimi E. Reddy V.B. Lerner E.A. Brief communication: MRGPRX2, atopic dermatitis and red man syndrome.Itch (Phila). 2017; 2: e5Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Among pediatric patients, age 2 years or more, previous RMS, vancomycin doses greater than or equal to 10 mg/kg, and concentrations greater than or equal to 5 mg/mL have been identified as risk factors for developing RMS.4Myers A.L. Gaedigk A. Dai H. James L.P. Jones B.L. Neville K.A. Defining risk factors for red man syndrome in children and adults.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012; 31: 464-468Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar The clinical characteristics of IgE-mediated and IgE-independent vancomycin HSRs can be indistinguishable, and uncertainty remains whether serum mast cell tryptase and ST can act as differentiators.5Wazny L.D. Daghigh B. Desensitization protocols for vancomycin hypersensitivity.Ann Pharmacother. 2001; 35: 1458-1464Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar Establishing the underlying mechanism is important because management options differ. Unlike IgE-dependent HSRs, vancomycin can be readministered following RMS, with precautions including premedication and slower infusion rates. Vancomycin desensitization in patients with IgE-mediated vancomycin HSRs should be considered if there are no antimicrobial alternatives and following a careful risk-benefit assessment. Successful intravenous desensitization protocols, both rapid and slow, have been published.5Wazny L.D. Daghigh B. Desensitization protocols for vancomycin hypersensitivity.Ann Pharmacother. 2001; 35: 1458-1464Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar Most require premedication and have been associated with mild symptoms such as pruritus; slow protocols are usually used after failed rapid desensitization attempts. Oral and inhaled routes of desensitization have also been described. Desensitization is contraindicated in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) (Figure 1). Although vancomycin-induced nonimmediate HSRs occur less frequently, vancomycin does account for up to two-thirds of antibiotic-associated drug rash eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (DRESS).6Lam B.D. Miller M.M. Sutton A.V. Peng D.M. Crew A.B. Vancomycin and DRESS: a retrospective chart review of 32 cases in Los Angeles, California.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 77: 973-975Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar Other nonimmediate vancomycin HSRs include maculopapular rash, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and less frequently acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Owing to the structural similarities of the glycopeptide antimicrobials, cross-reactivity is possible. However, immunologic cross-reactivity has not been demonstrated, and reports of clinically suspected glycopeptide cross-reactivity, immediate and delayed, are limited.7De Luca J.F. Holmes N.E. Trubiano J.A. Adverse reactions to vancomycin and cross-reactivity with other antibiotics.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 20: 352-361Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar RMS cross-reactivity between vancomycin and teicoplanin is unlikely because teicoplanin does not activate the MAS-related G-protein–coupled receptor X2.3Azimi E. Reddy V.B. Lerner E.A. Brief communication: MRGPRX2, atopic dermatitis and red man syndrome.Itch (Phila). 2017; 2: e5Crossref PubMed Google Scholar In the current issue, Alvarez-Arango et al8Alvarez-Arango S. Yerneni S. Tang O. Zhou L. Mancini C.M. Blackley S.V. et al.Vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions documented in electronic health records.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9: 906-912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar explore the prevalence of vancomycin allergy labeling and the challenges associated with identifying, characterizing, and documenting vancomycin HSRs. This large cross-sectional study across 2 US health care systems explored vancomycin HSRs documented in electronic health records over a 2-year period. Of 4,490,618 patients, 0.3% (n = 14,426) had a documented vancomycin drug allergy/hypersensitivity label with 18,761 documented suspected vancomycin HSRs. During the same 2-year period, more vancomycin drug allergy/hypersensitivity labels were added (mean, 253 ± 12) than removed (mean 12 ± 2) per quarter. Of the 18,761 documented suspected vancomycin HSRs, 42% were determined likely immediate and 20% likely nonimmediate on the basis of signs and symptoms documented. Common immediate reaction descriptions included RMS (or words/variations synonymous, n = 1909), hives (n = 1759), itching (n = 1651), flushing (n = 1106), and anaphylaxis (n = 708). The commonest nonimmediate HSR description was rash (n = 3710) followed by DRESS (n = 82) and dermatitis (n = 41). DRESS constituted 60% (82 of 136) of all documented suspected SCARs. Among all documented vancomycin HSRs, 3% (n = 536) offered descriptions suggestive of intolerances or side effects. A further 34% (n = 6440) could not be categorized on the basis of description or lack of description provided. Vancomycin drug allergy/hypersensitivity labels documented as flushing, rash, hives, itching, and anaphylaxis were not included in the RMS count. The authors did acknowledge the possibility these 10,051 patients may have also experienced RMS. This highlights a study limitation: there was no allergy or dermatology workup to confirm or refute the presence of true vancomycin hypersensitivity. Therefore, it only provides prevalence data on documented suspected but not documented confirmed vancomycin HSRs. Similarly, the phenotyping conducted by the authors, on the basis of signs and symptoms only, was not validated through specialist workup. Attempts to phenotype HSRs may have been undermined by the lack of information regarding reaction timing. For example, a rash documented without further details was considered nonimmediate from the assumed greater prevalence of maculopapular rashes compared with immediate HSR rashes. Reaction timings form a critical part of allergy history taking, without which misdiagnosis and incorrect determination of phenotype can occur. Vancomycin-induced DRESS, although rare, accounts for a significant proportion of antibiotic-induced DRESS in literature and of all suspected SCARs identified by Alvarez-Arango et al.6Lam B.D. Miller M.M. Sutton A.V. Peng D.M. Crew A.B. Vancomycin and DRESS: a retrospective chart review of 32 cases in Los Angeles, California.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 77: 973-975Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar,8Alvarez-Arango S. Yerneni S. Tang O. Zhou L. Mancini C.M. Blackley S.V. et al.Vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions documented in electronic health records.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9: 906-912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar Notably, 82.6% (19 of 23) of patients with RegiSCAR-defined vancomycin-induced DRESS carried HLA-A∗32:01, compared with 0% of the matched vancomycin-tolerant controls.9Konvinse K.C. Trubiano J.A. Pavlos R. James I. Shaffer C.M. Bejan C.A. et al.HLA-A∗32:01 is strongly associated with vancomycin-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 144: 183-190Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar If this association can be confirmed in larger and diverse cohorts, this allele may offer a potential means of diagnosing and preventing this potentially life-threatening SCAR. Alvarez-Arango et al8Alvarez-Arango S. Yerneni S. Tang O. Zhou L. Mancini C.M. Blackley S.V. et al.Vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions documented in electronic health records.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9: 906-912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar observed vancomycin allergy and HSR labels were added more frequently than removed over the study period. Data regarding the proportion of this cohort referred to an allergist or dermatologist may have provided insight into the infrequent removal of vancomycin allergy labeling. With ambiguity surrounding ST and mast cell tryptase, drug provocation testing (DPT) remains the criterion standard in differentiating between IgE-mediated and IgE-independent HSRs. However, because of the associated risks, DPT is often not performed when ST results are positive or mast cell tryptase levels are raised. Tolerance of vancomycin on DPT with premedication and/or slower infusion rates confirms RMS and permits future use of vancomycin (Figure 1). Where the diagnosis of RMS is not confirmed and documented clearly, clinicians may assume an IgE-mediated mechanism, which can lead to unnecessary vancomycin avoidance. Such antimicrobial avoidance can be associated with significant health care implications including delays in treatment, use of suboptimal antimicrobial therapy, worse health care outcomes, and increased health care costs.10Charneski L. Deshpande G. Smith S.W. Impact of an antimicrobial allergy label in the medical record on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.Pharmacotherapy. 2011; 31: 742-747Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar In conclusion, Alvarez-Arango et al8Alvarez-Arango S. Yerneni S. Tang O. Zhou L. Mancini C.M. Blackley S.V. et al.Vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions documented in electronic health records.J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021; 9: 906-912Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar illustrate the challenges faced when documenting vancomycin HSRs, partly due to the difficulty in differentiating between the IgE-mediated and RMS phenotypes. At present, apart from potentially high risk and costly DPT, there are no validated tests to confirm RMS and allow for vancomycin readministration. In addition, no allergenic determinants of vancomycin have been identified. Further research focused on epitope mapping and role of MAS-related G-protein–coupled receptor X2 in RMS and HLA-A∗32:01 in DRESS might help develop reliable in vitro tests capable of both confirming vancomycin HSR and identifying the underlying mechanism. Vancomycin Hypersensitivity Reactions Documented in Electronic Health RecordsThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In PracticeVol. 9Issue 2PreviewVancomycin, the most common antimicrobial used in US hospitals, can cause diverse adverse reactions, including hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Yet, little is known about vancomycin reactions documented in electronic health records. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
搜集达人应助阿拉采纳,获得10
1秒前
李爱国应助牛牛采纳,获得10
12秒前
yh完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
李健的小迷弟应助velen采纳,获得30
24秒前
26秒前
牛牛发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
48秒前
方文发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
1分钟前
阿拉发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
静静发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
NexusExplorer应助礼拜一采纳,获得80
1分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助静静采纳,获得10
1分钟前
丘比特应助aco采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
aco发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
礼拜一发布了新的文献求助80
1分钟前
wanci应助牛牛采纳,获得10
1分钟前
JamesPei应助旧残月采纳,获得10
1分钟前
2分钟前
牛牛发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
酷波er应助Ujjel75采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
旧残月发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
velen发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
velen完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
端庄亦巧发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
ffff完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Ava应助牛牛采纳,获得10
3分钟前
英姑应助gxj采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助DAWN采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6021087
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7627056
关于积分的说明 16166128
捐赠科研通 5168889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766181
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1748805
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636261