医学
肝细胞癌
四分位间距
核医学
实体瘤疗效评价标准
索拉非尼
置信区间
放射科
放射治疗
临床试验
内科学
临床研究阶段
作者
Anne-Laure Hermann,Arnaud Dieudonné,Maxime Ronot,Manuel Villa Sanchez,Helena Pereira,Gilles Chatellier,Etienne Garin,Laurent Castera,Rachida Lebtahi,Valérie Vilgrain
出处
期刊:Radiology
[Radiological Society of North America]
日期:2020-09-01
卷期号:296 (3): 673-684
被引量:94
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2020191606
摘要
Background Little is known about factors that influence the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Purpose To determine the relationship between tumor radiation–absorbed dose and survival and tumor response in locally advanced inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data (between December 2011 and March 2015) from participants who received TARE in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SARAH) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01482442). Tumor-absorbed dose was computed using technetium 99m (99mTc) macroaggregated human albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT. Visual agreement among CT, 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT, and yttrium 90 (90Y) SPECT/CT or PET/CT was scored as optimal, suboptimal, or not optimal. Overall survival (OS) and tumor response at 6-month follow-up CT (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) were assessed. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier tests. A propensity score comparing participants receiving a tumor dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy (best cut-off according to the receiver operating characteristic curve and median tumor radiation–absorbed dose values in the study groups) with those receiving sorafenib was calculated. Results One hundred twenty-one participants (median age, 67 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 61–73 years; 110 men) were evaluated in the dose-survival group, and 109 (median age, 66 years; IQR: 61–71 years; 100 men) were evaluated in the dose–tumor response group. In the dose-survival group, median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7 months, 10.7 months), and median tumor radiation–absorbed dose was 112 Gy (IQR: 68–220 Gy). Participants who received at least 100 Gy (n = 67) had longer survival than those who received less than 100 Gy (median, 14.1 months [95% CI: 9.6 months, 18.6 months] vs 6.1 months [95% CI: 4.9 months, 6.8 months], respectively; P < .001), and those with optimal agreement (n = 24) had the longest median OS (24.9 months; 95% CI: 9.6 months, 33.9 months). In the dose–tumor response group, tumor radiation–absorbed dose was higher in participants with disease control versus those with progressive disease (median, 121 Gy [IQR: 86–190 Gy] vs 85 Gy [IQR: 58–164 Gy]; P = .02). The highest disease control rate was observed in 31 of 40 participants (78%) with a tumor radiation–absorbed dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy and optimal agreement. Conclusion Higher tumor radiation–absorbed dose computed at technetium 99m macroaggregated human albumin SPECT/CT was associated with better overall survival and disease control in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization with yttrium 90 in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma trial. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sofocleous and Kamarinos in this issue.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI